Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63)
- Output Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000743
- Tokens per dollar: 1,346,667 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 34 minutes, 38.45 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
Output: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.000000
- Output Cost: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Total Cost: $0.595000 (rounded ~ $0.60)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001178
- Tokens per dollar: 848,739 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 22 minutes, 31.06 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.019063 Best Value | ↓ 94.9% cheaper | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.023750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 93.7% cheaper | ↓ 96% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.023750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 93.7% cheaper | ↓ 96% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.056250 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 85% cheaper | ↓ 90.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 79.7% cheaper | ↓ 87.2% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 70% cheaper | ↓ 81.1% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.114375 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 69.5% cheaper | ↓ 80.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.150000 | ↓ 60% cheaper | ↓ 74.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 59.3% cheaper | ↓ 74.4% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.190625 | ↓ 49.2% cheaper | ↓ 68% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.225000 (rounded ~ $0.23) | ↓ 40% cheaper | ↓ 62.2% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38) | Same price | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38) | Same price | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38) | Same price | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.381250 (rounded ~ $0.38) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.381250 (rounded ~ $0.38) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.570000 | ↑ 52% more | ↓ 4.2% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.570000 | ↑ 52% more | ↓ 4.2% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.595000 (rounded ~ $0.60) | ↑ 58.7% more | Same price |
| #20 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.703125 (rounded ~ $0.70) | ↑ 87.5% more | ↑ 18.2% more |
| #21 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.703125 (rounded ~ $0.70) | ↑ 87.5% more | ↑ 18.2% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.743750 (rounded ~ $0.74) | ↑ 98.3% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.743750 (rounded ~ $0.74) | ↑ 98.3% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #24 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.750000 | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 26.1% more |
| #25 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.750000 | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 26.1% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.487500 (rounded ~ $1.49) | ↑ 296.7% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$3.000000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 404.2% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$3.000000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 404.2% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Choosing the Right Engine for High-Volume Scripting
For enterprise teams generating long-form video content at scale, the choice between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro often comes down to the specific nature of your creative pipeline. Both models support massive context windows, making them ideal for maintaining narrative consistency across entire video series or complex, multi-part course modules.
Claude Opus 4.7 is frequently preferred by teams prioritizing nuance, sophisticated tone-matching, and complex instruction following. Its architecture excels at internalizing brand voice guidelines, ensuring that scripts for 8K-output videos maintain a consistent persona even when the underlying subject matter varies significantly. If your workflow relies on deep, multi-step logical reasoning to structure educational content, Opus 4.7 offers a highly predictable output that minimizes the need for iterative prompting.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, conversely, shines when integration with multimodal workflows is the primary goal. Because it is built with native vision and audio capabilities, it acts as a central hub for end-to-end production. If your scripting process requires the model to ‘see’ existing footage, analyze visual storyboards, or align text directly with timestamped audio cues, Gemini’s architecture streamlines these steps without requiring disjointed API calls to separate vision or audio services. For organizations scaling toward hundreds of hours of video, Gemini’s capacity to handle these modalities in a single pass can drastically reduce pipeline complexity and latency.