Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Devstral 2 for 10-Million Token Coding Pipelines

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has been replaced by Claude Sonnet 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Sonnet 5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Devstral 2
Complete Comparison: 10,000 input tokens × 1,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 30% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 30% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (30% cached)
Input Tokens 10,000 10,000
Output Tokens 1,000 1,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst $0.001000Best
Output Cost $0.003750Worst $0.000225Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.009225 Most Expensive $0.000955 Best Value
Processing Time 25.36 seconds 25.36 seconds
Tokens per Second 450 450
Time to First Token 200ms Worst 180ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000839Worst $0.000087Best
Tokens per Dollar 1,192,412Worst Value 11,518,325Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.750000Worst $0.100000Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $3.750000Worst $0.225000 (rounded ~ $0.23)Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.050000Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Caching Support
30
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 4.6
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$3 / $15 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
30%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.005250 Input Cost
$0.003750 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
11,000Total Tokens
$0.000839Cost per 1K
1,192,412Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

25.36s Processing Time
450 Tokens/Second
200ms Time to First Token
437 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

$0.009225
Total Cost
⚡ 30% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.003750
Optimized Cost $0.009225 Input: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.002025 18.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 10,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Output Cost: $0.003750
  • Total Cost: $0.009225
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000839
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,192,412 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 25.36 seconds
  • Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex refactoring/debugging; use Devstral 2 for high-throughputroutine code generation tasks.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Devstral 2 Mistral AI

$0.000955
Total Cost
⚡ 30% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.001225 Input: $0.001000
Output: $0.000225
Optimized Cost $0.000955 Input: $0.001000
Output: $0.000225
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.000270 22.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 10,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.001000
  • Output Cost: $0.000225
  • Total Cost: $0.000955
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000087
  • Tokens per dollar: 11,518,325 tokens
  • Context Window: 256000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 25.36 seconds
  • Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex refactoring/debugging; use Devstral 2 for high-throughputroutine code generation tasks.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Devstral 2. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 10,000
Output Tokens: 1,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 30%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Devstral 2
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.000258 Best Value ↓ 97.2% cheaper ↓ 73% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.000831 ↓ 91% cheaper ↓ 13% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.001173 ↓ 87.3% cheaper ↑ 22.8% more
#4 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.001173 ↓ 87.3% cheaper ↑ 22.8% more
#5 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.001288 ↓ 86% cheaper ↑ 34.8% more
#6 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.002306 ↓ 75% cheaper ↑ 141.5% more
#7 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.002494 ↓ 73% cheaper ↑ 161.1% more
#8 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.002825 ↓ 69.4% cheaper ↑ 195.8% more
#9 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.003075 ↓ 66.7% cheaper ↑ 222% more
#10 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.003108 ↓ 66.3% cheaper ↑ 225.4% more
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.003325 ↓ 64% cheaper ↑ 248.2% more
#12 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.003325 ↓ 64% cheaper ↑ 248.2% more
#13 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.004613 ↓ 50% cheaper ↑ 383% more
#14 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.004988 ↓ 45.9% cheaper ↑ 422.3% more
#15 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 33.3% cheaper ↑ 544% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 27.4% cheaper ↑ 600.9% more
#17 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 27.4% cheaper ↑ 600.9% more
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.008313 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 9.9% cheaper ↑ 770.4% more
#19 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.009300 ↑ 0.8% more ↑ 873.8% more
#20 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.009300 ↑ 0.8% more ↑ 873.8% more
#21 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.009563 ↑ 3.7% more ↑ 901.3% more
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.013300 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 44.2% more ↑ 1292.7% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 66.7% more ↑ 1509.9% more
#24 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 66.7% more ↑ 1509.9% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 66.7% more ↑ 1509.9% more
#26 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 66.7% more ↑ 1509.9% more
#27 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 80.2% more ↑ 1640.8% more
#28 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 80.2% more ↑ 1640.8% more
#29 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 80.2% more ↑ 1640.8% more
#30 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 80.2% more ↑ 1640.8% more
#31 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.028250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 206.2% more ↑ 2858.1% more
#32 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.030188 ↑ 227.2% more ↑ 3061% more
#33 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.030188 ↑ 227.2% more ↑ 3061% more
#34 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.030750 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 3119.9% more
#35 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.030750 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 3119.9% more
#36 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.033250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 260.4% more ↑ 3381.7% more
#37 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$0.056500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 512.5% more ↑ 5816.2% more
#38 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.061500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 6339.8% more
#39 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.080325 ↑ 770.7% more ↑ 8311% more
#40 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.080325 ↑ 770.7% more ↑ 8311% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000258
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 97.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↓ 73%
🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.000831
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 91%
vs Devstral 2: ↓ 13%
🥉

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.001173
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 87.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 22.8%
#4

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.001173
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 87.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 22.8%
#5

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.001288
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 86%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 34.8%
#6

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.002306
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 141.5%
#7

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.002494
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 73%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 161.1%
#8

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.002825
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 69.4%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 195.8%
#9

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.003075
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 222%
#10

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.003108
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 225.4%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.003325
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 64%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 248.2%
#12

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003325
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 64%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 248.2%
#13

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.004613
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 50%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 383%
#14

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.004988
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 45.9%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 422.3%
#15

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 544%
#16

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 27.4%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 600.9%
#17

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 27.4%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 600.9%
#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.008313 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 9.9%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 770.4%
#19

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.009300
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 0.8%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 873.8%
#20

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.009300
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 0.8%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 873.8%
#21

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.009563
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 3.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 901.3%
#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.013300 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 44.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1292.7%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1509.9%
#24

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1509.9%
#25

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1509.9%
#26

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1509.9%
#27

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 80.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1640.8%
#28

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 80.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1640.8%
#29

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 80.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1640.8%
#30

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 80.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 1640.8%
#31

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.028250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 206.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 2858.1%
#32

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.030188
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 227.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 3061%
#33

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.030188
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 227.2%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 3061%
#34

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.030750
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 3119.9%
#35

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.030750
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 3119.9%
#36

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.033250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 260.4%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 3381.7%
#37

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.056500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 512.5%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 5816.2%
#38

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.061500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 6339.8%
#39

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.080325
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 770.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 8311%
#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.080325
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 770.7%
vs Devstral 2: ↑ 8311%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Managing a 10-million token coding pipeline requires a strategic choice between high-reasoning capability and high-throughput efficiency. For large-scale code generation workflows, such as automated refactoring agents or large-file documentation tools, the friction point is often the trade-off between model intelligence and operational overhead. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is frequently selected for its ability to handle complex architectural reasoning, making it suitable for high-stakes refactoring or deep-dive code reviews where accuracy is non-negotiable. Its understanding of multi-file dependencies allows it to maintain context across significant codebases effectively. Conversely, Devstral 2 acts as a high-performance alternative designed for rapid, iterative code generation. It shines in scenarios where the task involves routine boilerplate, unit test generation, or high-volume ETL script creation, where the sheer number of tokens processed per day demands a highly efficient model. When building your pipeline, consider whether your bottleneck is the depth of logic (favoring Sonnet) or the volume of output (favoring Devstral). These models represent different ends of the coding-assistant spectrum; one provides the sophisticated logic needed for complex debugging, while the other offers a lean, cost-effective engine for scaling developer velocity without compromising on the essential requirements of modern software development workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.