Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.003750
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 10,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.003750
- Total Cost: $0.009225
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000839
- Tokens per dollar: 1,192,412 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 25.36 seconds
- Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Devstral 2 Mistral AI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000225
Output: $0.000225
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 10,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.001000
- Output Cost: $0.000225
- Total Cost: $0.000955
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000087
- Tokens per dollar: 11,518,325 tokens
- Context Window: 256000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 25.36 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Devstral 2. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 | vs Devstral 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000258 Best Value | ↓ 97.2% cheaper | ↓ 73% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000831 | ↓ 91% cheaper | ↓ 13% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.001173 | ↓ 87.3% cheaper | ↑ 22.8% more |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.001173 | ↓ 87.3% cheaper | ↑ 22.8% more |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001288 | ↓ 86% cheaper | ↑ 34.8% more |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.002306 | ↓ 75% cheaper | ↑ 141.5% more |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.002494 | ↓ 73% cheaper | ↑ 161.1% more |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.002825 | ↓ 69.4% cheaper | ↑ 195.8% more |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.003075 | ↓ 66.7% cheaper | ↑ 222% more |
| #10 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.003108 | ↓ 66.3% cheaper | ↑ 225.4% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.003325 | ↓ 64% cheaper | ↑ 248.2% more |
| #12 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003325 | ↓ 64% cheaper | ↑ 248.2% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.004613 | ↓ 50% cheaper | ↑ 383% more |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.004988 | ↓ 45.9% cheaper | ↑ 422.3% more |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 33.3% cheaper | ↑ 544% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 27.4% cheaper | ↑ 600.9% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.006694 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 27.4% cheaper | ↑ 600.9% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.008313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 9.9% cheaper | ↑ 770.4% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.009300 | ↑ 0.8% more | ↑ 873.8% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.009300 | ↑ 0.8% more | ↑ 873.8% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.009563 | ↑ 3.7% more | ↑ 901.3% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.013300 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 44.2% more | ↑ 1292.7% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 66.7% more | ↑ 1509.9% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 66.7% more | ↑ 1509.9% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 66.7% more | ↑ 1509.9% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 66.7% more | ↑ 1509.9% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 80.2% more | ↑ 1640.8% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 80.2% more | ↑ 1640.8% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 80.2% more | ↑ 1640.8% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 80.2% more | ↑ 1640.8% more |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.028250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 206.2% more | ↑ 2858.1% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.030188 | ↑ 227.2% more | ↑ 3061% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.030188 | ↑ 227.2% more | ↑ 3061% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.030750 | ↑ 233.3% more | ↑ 3119.9% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.030750 | ↑ 233.3% more | ↑ 3119.9% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.033250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 260.4% more | ↑ 3381.7% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.056500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 512.5% more | ↑ 5816.2% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.061500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 6339.8% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.080325 | ↑ 770.7% more | ↑ 8311% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.080325 | ↑ 770.7% more | ↑ 8311% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Managing a 10-million token coding pipeline requires a strategic choice between high-reasoning capability and high-throughput efficiency. For large-scale code generation workflows, such as automated refactoring agents or large-file documentation tools, the friction point is often the trade-off between model intelligence and operational overhead. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is frequently selected for its ability to handle complex architectural reasoning, making it suitable for high-stakes refactoring or deep-dive code reviews where accuracy is non-negotiable. Its understanding of multi-file dependencies allows it to maintain context across significant codebases effectively. Conversely, Devstral 2 acts as a high-performance alternative designed for rapid, iterative code generation. It shines in scenarios where the task involves routine boilerplate, unit test generation, or high-volume ETL script creation, where the sheer number of tokens processed per day demands a highly efficient model. When building your pipeline, consider whether your bottleneck is the depth of logic (favoring Sonnet) or the volume of output (favoring Devstral). These models represent different ends of the coding-assistant spectrum; one provides the sophisticated logic needed for complex debugging, while the other offers a lean, cost-effective engine for scaling developer velocity without compromising on the essential requirements of modern software development workflows.