Claude Sonnet 5.5 Context Window for IDE Code Suggestions

Complete Analysis: 10,500 tokens for Claude Sonnet 5.5
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings)
$0.015500 (rounded ~ $0.02) Total Cost
10,500 Total Tokens
35.88 seconds Processing Time
294 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.010000 Input Cost
$0.005000 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
10,500Total Tokens
$0.001476Cost per 1K
677,419Tokens per $

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

35.88s Processing Time
300 Tokens/Second
300ms Time to First Token
294 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes


📚 Research & Citations

Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Session length for billing

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.015500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.020000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.015500 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.020000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.009500 38.0% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 10,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.020000
  • Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.015500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001476
  • Tokens per dollar: 677,419 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 35.88 seconds
  • Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 294 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for high-precision inline code completion and refactoring tasks where multi-file project context is critical.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5.5
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 10,000
Output Tokens: 500
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
🏆 Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
$0.000800 Best Value ↓ 94.8% cheaper
🥈 GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.000800 ↓ 94.8% cheaper
🥉 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.001700 ↓ 89% cheaper
#4 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
$0.001850 ↓ 88.1% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.002125 ↓ 86.3% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.002900 ↓ 81.3% cheaper
#7 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.002900 ↓ 81.3% cheaper
#8 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.003500 ↓ 77.4% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.004250 ↓ 72.6% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 61.3% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 61.3% cheaper
#12 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.006375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 58.9% cheaper
#13 Grok Build 0.1
xAI
$0.006500 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 58.1% cheaper
#14 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 48.4% cheaper
#15 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.008125 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 47.6% cheaper
#16 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.008125 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 47.6% cheaper
#17 Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
$0.009570 ↓ 38.3% cheaper
#18 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.011875 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 23.4% cheaper
#19 Grok 4.7
xAI
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 9.7% cheaper
#20 Grok 4.6
xAI
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 9.7% cheaper
#21 Grok 4.5
xAI
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 9.7% cheaper
#22 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 3.2% more
#23 Gemini 4 Argon
Google
$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 3.2% more
#24 GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 3.2% more
#25 GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 3.2% more
#26 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 7.3% more
#27 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 7.3% more
#28 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
$0.016700 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 7.7% more
#29 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.017000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 9.7% more
#30 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.017000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 9.7% more
#31 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 37.1% more
#32 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 37.1% more
#33 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 54.8% more
#34 Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
$0.025050 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 61.6% more
#35 Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
$0.031000 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 100% more
#36 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 106.5% more
#37 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.040000 ↑ 158.1% more
#38 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.040000 ↑ 158.1% more
#39 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.040000 ↑ 158.1% more
#40 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.040000 ↑ 158.1% more
#41 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 174.2% more
#42 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 174.2% more
#43 Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
$0.050000 ↑ 222.6% more
#44 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 391.9% more
#45 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 391.9% more
#46 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.080000 ↑ 416.1% more
#47 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.080000 ↑ 416.1% more
#48 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.080000 ↑ 416.1% more
#49 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.199500 ↑ 1187.1% more
#50 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.199500 ↑ 1187.1% more
🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.000800
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 94.8%
🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.000800
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 94.8%
🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.001700
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89%
#4

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.001850
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 88.1%
#5

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.002125
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 86.3%
#6

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.002900
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 81.3%
#7

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.002900
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 81.3%
#8

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.003500
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 77.4%
#9

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.004250
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 72.6%
#10

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61.3%
#11

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61.3%
#12

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.006375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 58.9%
#13

Grok Build 0.1
xAI

$0.006500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 58.1%
#14

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 48.4%
#15

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.008125 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 47.6%
#16

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.008125 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 47.6%
#17

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.009570
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 38.3%
#18

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.011875 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 23.4%
#19

Grok 4.7
xAI

$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 9.7%
#20

Grok 4.6
xAI

$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 9.7%
#21

Grok 4.5
xAI

$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 9.7%
#22

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 3.2%
#23

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 3.2%
#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 3.2%
#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.016000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 3.2%
#26

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7.3%
#27

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.016625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7.3%
#28

Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI

$0.016700 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7.7%
#29

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.017000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 9.7%
#30

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.017000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 9.7%
#31

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 37.1%
#32

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 37.1%
#33

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 54.8%
#34

Kimi K3
Moonshot AI

$0.025050 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 61.6%
#35

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.031000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 100%
#36

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 106.5%
#37

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.040000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 158.1%
#38

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.040000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 158.1%
#39

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.040000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 158.1%
#40

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.040000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 158.1%
#41

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 174.2%
#42

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 174.2%
#43

Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI

$0.050000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 222.6%
#44

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 391.9%
#45

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 391.9%
#46

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.080000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 416.1%
#47

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.080000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 416.1%
#48

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.080000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 416.1%
#49

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.199500
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1187.1%
#50

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.199500
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1187.1%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 represents a significant step forward for developers requiring high-fidelity inline code suggestions within an IDE environment. Its architectural design emphasizes logical consistency and the ability to maintain complex state across multi-file codebases, making it highly effective for autocompletion tasks where understanding the surrounding project structure is essential. For academic researchers and indie developers managing smaller projects, the model offers a balance between deep reasoning capabilities and the rapid response times necessary for a fluid coding experience. Unlike general-purpose models that may struggle with the syntactic nuances of evolving programming paradigms, this iteration has been refined to grasp project-wide context, reducing the likelihood of hallucinations in function signatures or API calls. The model excels when tasked with generating boilerplate-heavy code or refactoring legacy modules into modern implementations. While some larger models may offer broader world knowledge, the specific optimization here favors precision in syntax, allowing for more reliable code generation during iterative development cycles. Developers integrating this model into their IDE workflow should prioritize environments where latency sensitivity is managed by efficient caching mechanisms. Its capacity to digest substantial context without losing sight of local scope makes it a robust choice for prototyping and maintaining research-grade software tools, ensuring that the suggestion engine remains relevant to the immediate task at hand.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.