Claude Sonnet 5.5 Pricing for 100K-Token Agentic Tasks

Complete Analysis: 102,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 5.5
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) Total Cost
102,000 Total Tokens
6 minutes, 3.98 seconds Processing Time
280 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.025000 Input Cost
$0.005000 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
102,000Total Tokens
$0.000306Cost per 1K
3,264,000Tokens per $

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

6m 3s Processing Time
300 Tokens/Second
300ms Time to First Token
280 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes


📚 Research & Citations

Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Session length for billing

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) Input: $0.050000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.050000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.023750 (rounded ~ $0.02) 43.2% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.050000
  • Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000306
  • Tokens per dollar: 3,264,000 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 6 minutes, 3.98 seconds
  • Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 280 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Orchestrating complex agentic tasks requiring high-fidelity reasoning and tool use.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5.5
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 2,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
🏆 Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
$0.003250 Best Value ↓ 89.6% cheaper
🥈 GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.003250 ↓ 89.6% cheaper
🥉 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.003350 ↓ 89.3% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.004188 ↓ 86.6% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 82.8% cheaper
#6 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 82.8% cheaper
#7 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 75.6% cheaper
#8 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 61% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 61% cheaper
#10 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 59.8% cheaper
#11 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 48% cheaper
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 46.4% cheaper
#13 Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
$0.020790 ↓ 33.5% cheaper
#14 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 0.6% cheaper
#15 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 0.6% cheaper
#16 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 4% more
#17 Gemini 4 Argon
Google
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 4% more
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 7.2% more
#19 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 42% more
#20 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 56% more
#21 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 88.8% more
#22 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 88.8% more
#23 Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 100% more
#24 GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 108% more
#25 GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 108% more
#26 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 108% more
#27 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 114.4% more
#28 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 160% more
#29 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 160% more
#30 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 160% more
#31 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 160% more
#32 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 168% more
#33 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 168% more
#34 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 168% more
#35 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 390% more
#36 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 390% more
#37 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) ↑ 420% more
#38 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) ↑ 420% more
#39 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 436% more
#40 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) ↑ 940% more
#41 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) ↑ 1092.8% more
#42 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) ↑ 1092.8% more
🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.003250
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.6%
🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003250
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.6%
🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003350
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.3%
#4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.004188
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 86.6%
#5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 82.8%
#6

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 82.8%
#7

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 75.6%
#8

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61%
#9

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61%
#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 59.8%
#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 48%
#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 46.4%
#13

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.020790
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 33.5%
#14

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 0.6%
#15

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 0.6%
#16

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 4%
#17

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 4%
#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7.2%
#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 42%
#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 56%
#21

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 88.8%
#22

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 88.8%
#23

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 100%
#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%
#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%
#26

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%
#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 114.4%
#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%
#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%
#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%
#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%
#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%
#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%
#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%
#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 390%
#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 390%
#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 420%
#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 420%
#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 436%
#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 940%
#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1092.8%
#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1092.8%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Orchestrating multi-agent systems requires a balance of high-level reasoning and reliable instruction following. When deploying an orchestrator-worker pattern, the orchestrator model must interpret complex, multi-step goals and delegate tasks effectively to specialized workers. Claude Sonnet 5.5 excels in these scenarios due to its refined reasoning capabilities, which significantly reduce the rate of misclassification or poor task delegation—a common pain point in production agentic loops.

For teams scaling these agentic architectures, the ability to maintain context across 100K-token tasks is vital. You need a model that doesn’t just process the prompt but understands the dependencies between successive worker outputs. Sonnet 5.5 provides a robust framework for handling these structured workflows without requiring frequent re-prompting or complex error-handling chains.

Furthermore, the latency profile of Sonnet 5.5 allows for snappier agent interactions, improving the user experience in live, conversational platforms. While some workloads might lean toward cheaper, lighter models, the orchestrator tier benefits immensely from the higher intelligence threshold provided by this architecture. It handles nuanced instructions better than previous iterations, making it a reliable choice for production environments where agent reliability is paramount. By offloading complex logic to the orchestrator, dev teams can often keep worker agents simpler and more focused, creating a more maintainable and modular codebase. This approach simplifies debugging and auditing agent logs, as the orchestrator acts as a clear, logical pivot point for all automated activities.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.