What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash for 100K-Token Multi-Agent Orchestration

Name: DeepSeek V4 Flash
Brand: DeepSeek
Price: 0.01 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 98% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic	DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	100,000	100,000
Output Tokens	2,000	2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.050000Worst	$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)Best
Output Cost	$0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst	$0.001200Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) Most Expensive	$0.008850 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value
Processing Time	5 minutes, 50.38 seconds Slowest	2 minutes, 41.81 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second	300Slowest	650Fastest
Time to First Token	300ms Worst	95ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000306Worst	$0.000087Best
Tokens per Dollar	3,264,000Worst Value	11,525,424Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.500000Worst	$0.150000Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$2.500000Worst	$0.600000Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.250000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.150000Best Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$1.250000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.600000Best Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) Input: $0.050000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Optimized Cost $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.050000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.023750 (rounded ~ $0.02) 43.2% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.050000
Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000306
Tokens per dollar: 3,264,000 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 5 minutes, 50.38 seconds
Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 291 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 for high-reasoning orchestration of complex archives and DeepSeek V4 Flash for rapidhigh-volume extraction of structured fields.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.008850 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✗ Not Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✗ Not Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

98% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.016200 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001200

Optimized Cost $0.008850 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001200
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.007350 (rounded ~ $0.01) 45.4% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output Cost: $0.001200
Total Cost: $0.008850 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000087
Tokens per dollar: 11,525,424 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 2 minutes, 41.81 seconds
Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 631 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 for high-reasoning orchestration of complex archives and DeepSeek V4 Flash for rapidhigh-volume extraction of structured fields.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5.5

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 100,000

Output Tokens: 2,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Sonnet 5.5	vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
🏆	Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic	$0.003250 Best Value	↓ 89.6% cheaper	↓ 63.3% cheaper
🥈	GPT-6 Luna OpenAI	$0.003250	↓ 89.6% cheaper	↓ 63.3% cheaper
🥉	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.003350	↓ 89.3% cheaper	↓ 62.1% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.004188	↓ 86.6% cheaper	↓ 52.7% cheaper
#5	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 82.8% cheaper	↓ 39.3% cheaper
#6	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 82.8% cheaper	↓ 39.3% cheaper
#7	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 75.6% cheaper	↓ 13.8% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 61% cheaper	↑ 37.7% more
#9	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 61% cheaper	↑ 37.7% more
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 59.8% cheaper	↑ 41.9% more
#11	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 48% cheaper	↑ 83.6% more
#12	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 46.4% cheaper	↑ 89.3% more
#13	Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI	$0.020790	↓ 33.5% cheaper	↑ 134.9% more
#14	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 0.6% cheaper	↑ 251% more
#15	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 0.6% cheaper	↑ 251% more
#16	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 4% more	↑ 267.2% more
#17	Gemini 4 Argon Google	$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 4% more	↑ 267.2% more
#18	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 7.2% more	↑ 278.5% more
#19	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 42% more	↑ 401.4% more
#20	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 56% more	↑ 450.8% more
#21	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 88.8% more	↑ 566.7% more
#22	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 88.8% more	↑ 566.7% more
#23	Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 100% more	↑ 606.2% more
#24	GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 108% more	↑ 634.5% more
#25	GPT-6 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 108% more	↑ 634.5% more
#26	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 108% more	↑ 634.5% more
#27	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 114.4% more	↑ 657.1% more
#28	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 160% more	↑ 818.1% more
#29	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 160% more	↑ 818.1% more
#30	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 160% more	↑ 818.1% more
#31	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 160% more	↑ 818.1% more
#32	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 168% more	↑ 846.3% more
#33	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 168% more	↑ 846.3% more
#34	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 168% more	↑ 846.3% more
#35	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 390% more	↑ 1630.2% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 390% more	↑ 1630.2% more
#37	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)	↑ 420% more	↑ 1736.2% more
#38	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)	↑ 420% more	↑ 1736.2% more
#39	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)	↑ 436% more	↑ 1792.7% more
#40	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)	↑ 940% more	↑ 3572.3% more
#41	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)	↑ 1092.8% more	↑ 4111.9% more
#42	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)	↑ 1092.8% more	↑ 4111.9% more

🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.003250

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 63.3%

🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003250

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 63.3%

🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003350

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 89.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 62.1%

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.004188

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 86.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 52.7%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 82.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 39.3%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 82.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 39.3%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 75.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 13.8%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 37.7%

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 37.7%

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 59.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 41.9%

#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 48%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 83.6%

#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 46.4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 89.3%

#13

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.020790

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 33.5%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 134.9%

#14

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 0.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 251%

#15

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 0.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 251%

#16

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 267.2%

#17

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 267.2%

#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7.2%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 278.5%

#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 42%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 401.4%

#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 56%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 450.8%

#21

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 88.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#22

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 88.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#23

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 100%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 606.2%

#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 634.5%

#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 634.5%

#26

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 108%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 634.5%

#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 114.4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 657.1%

#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 818.1%

#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 818.1%

#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 818.1%

#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 160%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 818.1%

#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 846.3%

#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 846.3%

#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 168%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 846.3%

#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 390%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1630.2%

#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 390%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1630.2%

#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 420%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1736.2%

#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 420%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1736.2%

#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 436%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1792.7%

#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 940%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3572.3%

#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1092.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4111.9%

#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)

vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1092.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4111.9%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Multi-agent orchestration requires a strong balance between the orchestrator’s reasoning depth and the worker agents’ throughput. Claude Sonnet 5.5 often serves as the “brain,” capable of decomposing complex, multi-page document archives into actionable sub-tasks. Its architectural ability to handle nuanced instructions and maintain state makes it ideal for the orchestrator role in legacy paper digitization, where layout complexity and handwriting ambiguity are constant challenges.

In contrast, DeepSeek V4 Flash acts as a high-efficiency worker, perfect for executing repetitive tasks—such as specific field extraction, table parsing, or simple OCR clean-up—at scale. By offloading bulk processing to the faster, more cost-efficient worker agent while keeping the orchestration logic with the more capable model, teams can optimize for both accuracy and latency. When planning a pipeline handling 100K-token tasks, the critical decision involves balancing the orchestrator’s token budget against the worker’s operational speed to ensure the system remains responsive. This orchestration pattern is particularly effective for teams scaling features that require deep document analysis without incurring the overhead of using a top-tier model for every single step of the process. The synergy between a reasoning-heavy lead and a throughput-optimized worker is the gold standard for robust document processing pipelines in production environments. Choosing between these models depends on whether your bottleneck is the reasoning complexity of the orchestration layer or the sheer volume of data being passed to the worker nodes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash for 100K-Token Multi-Agent Orchestration

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI