What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4: 500K-Token Comparison for A/B Testing

Name: GPT-5.4
Brand: OpenAI
Price: 0.71 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4

Complete Comparison: 500,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	GPT-5.4 OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	500,000	500,000
Output Tokens	2,000	2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.250000Best	$1.250000Worst
Output Cost	$0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)Best	$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14) Best Value	$0.710000 Most Expensive
Processing Time	19 minutes, 27.88 seconds Fastest	21 minutes, 19.08 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	460Fastest	420Slowest
Time to First Token	195ms Best	210ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000284Best	$0.001414Worst
Tokens per Dollar	3,522,807Best Value	707,042Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.500000Best	$2.500000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$2.500000Best	$11.250000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.250000Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$1.250000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$1.250000Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$5.625000 (rounded ~ $5.63)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.255000 (rounded ~ $0.26) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Optimized Cost $0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) 44.1% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.250000
Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost: $0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000284
Tokens per dollar: 3,522,807 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 460 tokens per second and 195ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 19 minutes, 27.88 seconds
Latency: 195 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 460 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 430 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choosing between creative flair (Claude Sonnet 5) and multi-step logical reasoning (GPT-5.4) for high-volume content generation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.4 OpenAI 1024000 🏔️ Context Cliff

$0.710000

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $1.272500 (rounded ~ $1.27) Input: $1.250000
Output: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)

Optimized Cost $0.710000 Input: $1.250000
Output: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56) 44.2% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

🏔️ Context Cliff

Premium Tier

>272,000 tokens triggered premium pricing

📊 Cliff Pricing

Premium

premium pricing (threshold: 272,000)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $1.250000
Output Cost: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Total Cost: $0.710000
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001414
Tokens per dollar: 707,042 tokens
Context Window: 1024000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 420 tokens per second and 210ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 21 minutes, 19.08 seconds
Latency: 210 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 420 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 393 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choosing between creative flair (Claude Sonnet 5) and multi-step logical reasoning (GPT-5.4) for high-volume content generation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 500,000

Output Tokens: 2,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Sonnet 5	vs GPT-5.4
🏆	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.017938 (rounded ~ $0.02) Best Value	↓ 87.4% cheaper	↓ 97.5% cheaper
🥈	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 84.6% cheaper	↓ 96.9% cheaper
🥉	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 84.6% cheaper	↓ 96.9% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.053438 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↓ 62.5% cheaper	↓ 92.5% cheaper
#5	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.071750 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↓ 49.6% cheaper	↓ 89.9% cheaper
#6	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.106875 (rounded ~ $0.11)	↓ 25% cheaper	↓ 84.9% cheaper
#7	Gemini 3.5 Flash Google	$0.107625 (rounded ~ $0.11)	↓ 24.5% cheaper	↓ 84.8% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.143500 (rounded ~ $0.14)	↑ 0.7% more	↓ 79.8% cheaper
#9	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.179375	↑ 25.9% more	↓ 74.7% cheaper
#10	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.213750 (rounded ~ $0.21)	↑ 50% more	↓ 69.9% cheaper
#11	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 150% more	↓ 49.8% cheaper
#12	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 150% more	↓ 49.8% cheaper
#13	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 150% more	↓ 49.8% cheaper
#14	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 150% more	↓ 49.8% cheaper
#15	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 151.8% more	↓ 49.5% cheaper
#16	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36)	↑ 151.8% more	↓ 49.5% cheaper
#17	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56)	↑ 291.6% more	↓ 21.4% cheaper
#18	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56)	↑ 291.6% more	↓ 21.4% cheaper
#19	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.568000 (rounded ~ $0.57)	↑ 298.6% more	↓ 20% cheaper
#20	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67)	↑ 367.1% more	↓ 6.2% cheaper
#21	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67)	↑ 367.1% more	↓ 6.2% cheaper
#22	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.710000	↑ 398.2% more	Same price
#23	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.710000	↑ 398.2% more	Same price
#24	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71)	↑ 400% more	↑ 0.4% more
#25	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71)	↑ 400% more	↑ 0.4% more
#26	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$1.420000	↑ 896.5% more	↑ 100% more
#27	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$2.850000	↑ 1900% more	↑ 301.4% more
#28	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$2.850000	↑ 1900% more	↑ 301.4% more

🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.017938 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 87.4%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 97.5%

🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 84.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 96.9%

🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 84.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 96.9%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.053438 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 62.5%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 92.5%

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.071750 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 49.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 89.9%

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.106875 (rounded ~ $0.11)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 25%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 84.9%

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.107625 (rounded ~ $0.11)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 24.5%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 84.8%

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.143500 (rounded ~ $0.14)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 0.7%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 79.8%

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.179375

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 25.9%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 74.7%

#10

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.213750 (rounded ~ $0.21)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 50%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 69.9%

#11

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.8%

#12

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.8%

#13

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.8%

#14

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.8%

#15

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 151.8%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.5%

#16

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 151.8%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 49.5%

#17

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 291.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 21.4%

#18

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 291.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 21.4%

#19

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.568000 (rounded ~ $0.57)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 298.6%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 20%

#20

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 367.1%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 6.2%

#21

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 367.1%

vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 6.2%

#22

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.710000

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 398.2%

vs GPT-5.4: Same

#23

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.710000

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 398.2%

vs GPT-5.4: Same

#24

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%

vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 0.4%

#25

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%

vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 0.4%

#26

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$1.420000

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 896.5%

vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 100%

#27

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$2.850000

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1900%

vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 301.4%

#28

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$2.850000

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1900%

vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 301.4%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For marketing teams managing high-volume A/B testing, the choice between Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 often comes down to the specific nature of the copy. Claude Sonnet 5 is frequently preferred for its ability to maintain consistent brand voice over long context windows, which is essential when testing dozens of campaign variations that must remain aligned with a single brand style guide. It excels at generating nuanced, human-like copy that feels less ‘formulaic’ than earlier iterations.

GPT-5.4, by contrast, shines in its reasoning capabilities. If your A/B testing workflow involves complex logical dependencies—such as dynamically adjusting copy based on performance data from previous iterations or cross-referencing multi-file briefs—GPT-5.4’s ability to plan and execute multi-step agentic tasks is a significant advantage. It is particularly effective for teams that need to generate variations that are not just linguistically different but structurally optimized for specific conversion funnels.

Ultimately, if your primary goal is creative linguistic diversity, Claude Sonnet 5 offers a refined, ‘less robotic’ output. If your workflow requires the model to act as a logical analyst that iterates based on complex, multi-variable constraints, GPT-5.4 provides the stronger agentic framework. For a 500K-token batch, testing both on a small subset of your campaign is the best way to determine which model’s reasoning style aligns better with your specific conversion goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4: 500K-Token Comparison for A/B Testing

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

GPT-5.4 OpenAI 1024000 🏔️ Context Cliff

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI