Cost Optimization: Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash for 100K Multi-Turn Support Conversations

Claude Haiku 4.6 is no longer available

This model has been withdrawn by its provider and can no longer be called. The figures below are kept as a historical record and do not reflect a currently purchasable rate.

See current Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Complete Comparison: 8,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Haiku 4.6
Anthropic
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 8,000 8,000
Output Tokens 2,000 2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.000500Best $0.003000Worst
Output Cost $0.000625Best $0.004500Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.000900 Best Value $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) Most Expensive
Processing Time 12.77 seconds 12.77 seconds
Tokens per Second 850 850
Time to First Token 75ms Best 90ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000090Best $0.000615Worst
Tokens per Dollar 11,111,111Best Value 1,626,016Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)Best $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best $2.250000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Video Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Audio Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Haiku 4.6
AnthropicMax Context: 200,000 tokens
$0.25 / $1.25 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.000900 Total Cost
$0.000250 Input Cost
$0.000625 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
10,000Total Tokens
$0.000090Cost per 1K
11,111,111Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

12.77s Processing Time
850 Tokens/Second
75ms Time to First Token
794 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.000900
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.001125 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.000625
Optimized Cost $0.000900 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.000625
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.000225 20.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.000500
  • Output Cost: $0.000625
  • Total Cost: $0.000900
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000090
  • Tokens per dollar: 11,111,111 tokens
  • Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 12.77 seconds
  • Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for indie game developers needing consistentlow-latency NPC dialogue and cost-effectivehigh-volume customer support automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google 1000000

$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✓ Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✓ Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003000
Output: $0.004500
Optimized Cost $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003000
Output: $0.004500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.001350 18.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.003000
  • Output Cost: $0.004500
  • Total Cost: $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000615
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,626,016 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 90ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 12.77 seconds
  • Latency: 90 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for indie game developers needing consistentlow-latency NPC dialogue and cost-effectivehigh-volume customer support automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 8,000
Output Tokens: 2,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.000260 Best Value ↓ 71.1% cheaper ↓ 95.8% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.001025 ↑ 13.9% more ↓ 83.3% cheaper
🥉 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.001300 ↑ 44.4% more ↓ 78.9% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.001580 ↑ 75.6% more ↓ 74.3% cheaper
#5 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.001580 ↑ 75.6% more ↓ 74.3% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.002700 ↑ 200% more ↓ 56.1% cheaper
#7 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.003075 ↑ 241.7% more ↓ 50% cheaper
#8 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.003100 ↑ 244.4% more ↓ 49.6% cheaper
#9 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.003410 ↑ 278.9% more ↓ 44.6% cheaper
#10 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.003600 ↑ 300% more ↓ 41.5% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.004100 ↑ 355.6% more ↓ 33.3% cheaper
#12 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.004100 ↑ 355.6% more ↓ 33.3% cheaper
#13 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.005400 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 500% more ↓ 12.2% cheaper
#14 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 583.3% more Same price
#15 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 700% more ↑ 17.1% more
#16 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 833.3% more ↑ 36.6% more
#17 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 833.3% more ↑ 36.6% more
#18 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 891.7% more ↑ 45.1% more
#19 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 891.7% more ↑ 45.1% more
#20 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.010250 ↑ 1038.9% more ↑ 66.7% more
#21 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.010800 ↑ 1100% more ↑ 75.6% more
#22 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 1316.7% more ↑ 107.3% more
#23 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.016400 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 1722.2% more ↑ 166.7% more
#24 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 192.7% more
#25 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 192.7% more
#26 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 192.7% more
#27 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 192.7% more
#28 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.020500 ↑ 2177.8% more ↑ 233.3% more
#29 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.020500 ↑ 2177.8% more ↑ 233.3% more
#30 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.020500 ↑ 2177.8% more ↑ 233.3% more
#31 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.020500 ↑ 2177.8% more ↑ 233.3% more
#32 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.031000 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 3344.4% more ↑ 404.1% more
#33 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 3816.7% more ↑ 473.2% more
#34 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 3816.7% more ↑ 473.2% more
#35 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 485.4% more
#36 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 485.4% more
#37 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.041000 ↑ 4455.6% more ↑ 566.7% more
#38 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.062000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 6788.9% more ↑ 908.1% more
#39 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.072000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 7900% more ↑ 1070.7% more
#40 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 11800% more ↑ 1641.5% more
#41 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 11800% more ↑ 1641.5% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000260
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 71.1%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 95.8%
🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.001025
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 13.9%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 83.3%
🥉

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.001300
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 44.4%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 78.9%
#4

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.001580
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 75.6%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 74.3%
#5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.001580
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 75.6%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 74.3%
#6

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.002700
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 56.1%
#7

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.003075
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 241.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 50%
#8

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.003100
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 244.4%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 49.6%
#9

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.003410
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 278.9%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 44.6%
#10

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.003600
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 300%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 41.5%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.004100
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 355.6%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 33.3%
#12

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.004100
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 355.6%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 33.3%
#13

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.005400 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 500%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 12.2%
#14

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 583.3%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: Same
#15

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 17.1%
#16

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 833.3%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 36.6%
#17

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 833.3%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 36.6%
#18

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 891.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 45.1%
#19

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 891.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 45.1%
#20

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.010250
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1038.9%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 66.7%
#21

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.010800
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 75.6%
#22

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1316.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 107.3%
#23

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.016400 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1722.2%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 166.7%
#24

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%
#25

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%
#26

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%
#27

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%
#28

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.020500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
#29

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.020500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
#30

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.020500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
#31

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.020500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
#32

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.031000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3344.4%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 404.1%
#33

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3816.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 473.2%
#34

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3816.7%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 473.2%
#35

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 485.4%
#36

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 485.4%
#37

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.041000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 4455.6%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
#38

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.062000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 6788.9%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 908.1%
#39

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.072000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7900%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1070.7%
#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 11800%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1641.5%
#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 11800%
vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1641.5%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For indie developers building in-game customer support or AI-driven NPC dialogue, the primary challenge is balancing character consistency with low-latency responsiveness. When scaling to 100,000 multi-turn conversations, the choice between Claude Haiku 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash often comes down to your specific technical architecture and the nature of your interaction loops.

Claude Haiku 4.6 is frequently favored for its reliability in following complex instructions and maintaining persona consistency. In multi-turn scenarios, it excels at adhering to strict system prompts without drifting, which is critical for maintaining an immersive in-game experience. If your support NPCs require high-fidelity adherence to a specific tone or a rigid lore-based rulebook, Haiku’s focused instruction-following capabilities provide a stable foundation.

On the other hand, Gemini 3.5 Flash is engineered for high-throughput, agentic workflows. Its speed and multimodal-native architecture make it a powerhouse if your support pipeline involves more than just text—such as processing user-submitted screenshots of bug reports or integrating real-time game state data. Gemini 3.5 Flash is particularly adept at handling iterative, multi-step tasks efficiently, often reducing the overhead in complex agentic chains.

Ultimately, the decision rests on your project’s primary friction point. If your priority is absolute adherence to persona and instruction-following, Claude Haiku 4.6 is often the preferred choice for consistent dialogue. If you require a fast, multimodal-ready engine that can handle rapid-fire reasoning across diverse inputs, Gemini 3.5 Flash delivers exceptional ROI.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Haiku 4.6 currently costs $0.25 / $1.25 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →