Cost per 100K Tokens: DeepSeek V4 Flash for Summarization

Complete Analysis: 102,000 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash
⚡ 70% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for DeepSeek's DeepSeek V4 Flash model with 70% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 98% savings)
$0.004956 Total Cost
102,000 Total Tokens
2 minutes, 46.52 seconds Processing Time
613 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeekMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.14 / $0.28 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
70%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.004200 Input Cost
$0.000560 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
102,000Total Tokens
$0.000049Cost per 1K
20,581,114Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

2m 46s Processing Time
650 Tokens/Second
95ms Time to First Token
613 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.004956
Total Cost
⚡ 70% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
Caching
✓ Available
98% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.014560 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000560
Optimized Cost $0.004956 Input: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000560
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.009604 66.0% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Output Cost: $0.000560
  • Total Cost: $0.004956
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000049
  • Tokens per dollar: 20,581,114 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 2 minutes, 46.52 seconds
  • Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 613 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Excellent for cost-sensitivehigh-volume text generation tasks like summarizing educational transcripts or drafting recurring reportswhere efficiency and affordability are key.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 2,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 70%
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.001075 Best Value ↓ 78.3% cheaper
🥈 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
$0.001075 ↓ 78.3% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.003063 ↓ 38.2% cheaper
#4 Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
$0.003185 ↓ 35.7% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.004025 ↓ 18.8% cheaper
#6 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.004025 ↓ 18.8% cheaper
#7 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
$0.004150 ↓ 16.3% cheaper
#8 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 8.5% more
#9 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.008813 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 77.8% more
#10 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.009188 ↑ 85.4% more
#11 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 127% more
#12 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.011750 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 137.1% more
#13 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.012250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 147.2% more
#14 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.012250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 147.2% more
#15 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.012375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 149.7% more
#16 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.017625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 255.6% more
#17 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.018375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 270.8% more
#18 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
$0.021000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 323.7% more
#19 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 367.9% more
#20 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 367.9% more
#21 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.023500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 374.2% more
#22 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.030625 ↑ 517.9% more
#23 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.033125 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 568.4% more
#24 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 611.3% more
#25 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.041000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 727.3% more
#26 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.041000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 727.3% more
#27 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.049000 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 888.7% more
#28 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1085.4% more
#29 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1085.4% more
#30 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1085.4% more
#31 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1085.4% more
#32 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1135.9% more
#33 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1135.9% more
#34 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1135.9% more
#35 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1135.9% more
#36 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.104375 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 2006% more
#37 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.104375 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 2006% more
#38 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 2170% more
#39 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) ↑ 2270.9% more
#40 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) ↑ 2270.9% more
#41 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12) ↑ 2371.8% more
#42 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$0.225000 (rounded ~ $0.23) ↑ 4440% more
#43 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.235000 (rounded ~ $0.24) ↑ 4641.7% more
#44 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28) ↑ 5514.4% more
#45 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28) ↑ 5514.4% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001075
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 78.3%
🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.001075
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 78.3%
🥉

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003063
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 38.2%
#4

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

$0.003185
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 35.7%
#5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004025
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 18.8%
#6

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004025
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 18.8%
#7

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.004150
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 16.3%
#8

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 8.5%
#9

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.008813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 77.8%
#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.009188
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 85.4%
#11

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 127%
#12

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.011750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 137.1%
#13

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.012250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 147.2%
#14

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.012250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 147.2%
#15

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.012375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 149.7%
#16

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.017625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 255.6%
#17

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.018375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 270.8%
#18

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.021000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 323.7%
#19

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 367.9%
#20

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 367.9%
#21

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.023500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 374.2%
#22

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.030625
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 517.9%
#23

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.033125 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 568.4%
#24

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 611.3%
#25

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.041000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 727.3%
#26

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.041000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 727.3%
#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.049000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 888.7%
#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1085.4%
#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1085.4%
#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1085.4%
#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1085.4%
#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1135.9%
#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1135.9%
#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1135.9%
#35

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.061250 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1135.9%
#36

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.104375 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2006%
#37

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.104375 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2006%
#38

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2170%
#39

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2270.9%
#40

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2270.9%
#41

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2371.8%
#42

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.225000 (rounded ~ $0.23)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4440%
#43

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.235000 (rounded ~ $0.24)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4641.7%
#44

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 5514.4%
#45

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 5514.4%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Affordable High-Volume Summarization

DeepSeek V4 Flash offers a compelling solution for high-volume text generation tasks like summarizing educational tutoring sessions or generating reports. Its affordability and large 1,000,000 token context window make it suitable for processing lengthy transcripts or documents efficiently. For legal tech companies, this model provides a cost-effective way to handle large amounts of text without compromising on scale.

While it excels in cost-efficiency, for highly complex or critical legal applications requiring the utmost nuanced reasoning, rigorous testing against premium models might be necessary. However, for straightforward summarization and content generation at enterprise scale, DeepSeek V4 Flash is a top contender for budget optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.