Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.100000
- Output Cost: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000657
- Tokens per dollar: 1,522,388 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4 minutes, 22.83 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 388 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.1 Pro| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001525 Best Value | ↓ 97.7% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.004188 | ↓ 93.8% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 88.6% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.3% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.015750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 76.5% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 75.7% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #11 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #12 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.017325 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 74.1% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.024375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 63.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.025125 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 62.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 53.6% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 53.6% cheaper |
| #17 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 51.5% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.041875 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 33.8% cheaper |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 27.2% cheaper |
| #21 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 11.9% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 11.9% cheaper |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 21.3% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 21.3% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 21.3% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 21.3% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 25% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 25% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 25% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 25% more |
| #31 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 128.5% more |
| #32 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 128.5% more |
| #33 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.157500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 135.1% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 142.5% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 142.5% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 150% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.315000 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↑ 370.1% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 385.1% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 456.3% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 456.3% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Large-Scale 10-K Parsing
For localization managers and enterprise architects handling financial earnings analysis, the primary bottleneck is often the effective parsing of dense, multi-page 10-K filings. These documents frequently contain complex table structures, nested footnotes, and varying narrative styles that challenge standard extraction pipelines. Gemini 3.1 Pro excels in this domain due to its refined reasoning architecture, which allows it to maintain coherence across massive document structures while minimizing the structural hallucinations often seen in smaller models.
When processing 100,000-token filings, the model demonstrates high semantic fidelity, ensuring that cross-document references—such as matching an audit finding in the notes to a specific line item in the balance sheet—remain accurate. Unlike models that rely on simple pattern matching, Gemini 3.1 Pro is better equipped for the nuance of financial jargon, making it a strong candidate for teams prioritizing high-precision automated data extraction over raw speed.
For high-volume production, the model’s native multimodal capabilities provide an advantage when these filings include embedded charts or diagrams that traditional OCR might misinterpret. However, teams should account for the model’s operational overhead; while it offers superior reasoning depth, it is best utilized in scenarios where the accuracy of the extracted data is the primary business driver, rather than the lowest possible inference cost.