Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 150,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.300000
- Output Cost: $0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
- Total Cost: $0.295500 (rounded ~ $0.30)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001931
- Tokens per dollar: 517,766 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 49.46 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
Output: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 150,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.450000
- Output Cost: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Total Cost: $0.434250 (rounded ~ $0.43)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002838
- Tokens per dollar: 352,332 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 3.98 seconds
- Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 421 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.1 Pro| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro | vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.030450 Best Value | ↓ 89.7% cheaper | ↓ 93% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.036938 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 87.5% cheaper | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.046425 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 84.3% cheaper | ↓ 89.3% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.046425 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 84.3% cheaper | ↓ 89.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.069375 | ↓ 76.5% cheaper | ↓ 84% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.073875 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 75% cheaper | ↓ 83% cheaper |
| #7 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.087795 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 70.3% cheaper | ↓ 79.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.108563 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 63.3% cheaper | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.110813 | ↓ 62.5% cheaper | ↓ 74.5% cheaper |
| #10 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.135750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↓ 54.1% cheaper | ↓ 68.7% cheaper |
| #11 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.136759 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↓ 53.7% cheaper | ↓ 68.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
|
$0.136759 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↓ 53.7% cheaper | ↓ 68.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.144750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↓ 51% cheaper | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.147750 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 50% cheaper | ↓ 66% cheaper |
| #15 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.155925 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 47.2% cheaper | ↓ 64.1% cheaper |
| #16 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.169688 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper | ↓ 60.9% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.169688 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper | ↓ 60.9% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.192188 (rounded ~ $0.19) | ↓ 35% cheaper | ↓ 55.7% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.217125 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 26.5% cheaper | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #20 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.221625 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 25% cheaper | ↓ 49% cheaper |
| #21 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.269063 | ↓ 8.9% cheaper | ↓ 38% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.277500 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↓ 6.1% cheaper | ↓ 36.1% cheaper |
| #23 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.277500 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↓ 6.1% cheaper | ↓ 36.1% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.289500 | ↓ 2% cheaper | ↓ 33.3% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.369375 | ↑ 25% more | ↓ 14.9% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.369375 | ↑ 25% more | ↓ 14.9% cheaper |
| #27 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.369375 | ↑ 25% more | ↓ 14.9% cheaper |
| #28 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.434250 (rounded ~ $0.43) | ↑ 47% more | Same price |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.723750 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↑ 144.9% more | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.723750 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↑ 144.9% more | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.723750 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↑ 144.9% more | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.723750 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↑ 144.9% more | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.738750 (rounded ~ $0.74) | ↑ 150% more | ↑ 70.1% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.738750 (rounded ~ $0.74) | ↑ 150% more | ↑ 70.1% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.738750 (rounded ~ $0.74) | ↑ 150% more | ↑ 70.1% more |
| #36 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$1.417500 (rounded ~ $1.42) | ↑ 379.7% more | ↑ 226.4% more |
| #37 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.430625 | ↑ 384.1% more | ↑ 229.4% more |
| #38 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.430625 | ↑ 384.1% more | ↑ 229.4% more |
| #39 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$1.447500 (rounded ~ $1.45) | ↑ 389.8% more | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #40 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$1.447500 (rounded ~ $1.45) | ↑ 389.8% more | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #41 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$1.447500 (rounded ~ $1.45) | ↑ 389.8% more | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #42 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.835000 (rounded ~ $2.84) | ↑ 859.4% more | ↑ 552.8% more |
| #43 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.835000 (rounded ~ $2.84) | ↑ 859.4% more | ↑ 552.8% more |
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6: Choosing the Right Agent Orchestrator for EdTech
EdTech product managers often seek AI models that offer a compelling balance of advanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness for their multi-agent orchestration needs. Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro and Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.6 are two leading contenders that provide robust reasoning and tool-use features suitable for complex educational AI systems.
Model Strengths for Multi-Agent Orchestration:
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Offers a vast 2,000,000 token context window, making it exceptional for processing extensive student data or long lesson plans. It boasts strong multimodal capabilities (text, vision, audio, video), tool use, and reasoning. Its pricing is tiered based on context length, starting at $2/$12 per 1M tokens for contexts under 200K and increasing for longer contexts [10, 13, 14].
- Claude Sonnet 4.6: Features a 1,000,000 token context window and is praised for its strong reasoning, tool calling, and ‘computer use’ capabilities, making it excellent for agentic workflows [2, 3, 4]. It is priced competitively at $3/$15 per 1M tokens, with potential cost savings through prompt caching and batch processing [2, 4].
Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness Comparison:
For typical multi-agent orchestration tasks involving moderate context lengths (e.g., up to 200K tokens), Gemini 3.1 Pro is generally more cost-effective than Claude Sonnet 4.6. However, when dealing with very long contexts (over 200K tokens), Gemini’s price increases significantly ($4/$18 per 1M tokens), making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the more economical choice in those scenarios [15].
Cost Example for Multi-Agent Orchestration (150K Input, 3K Output Tokens):
Let’s analyze the cost for an orchestrator handling 150,000 input tokens and generating 3,000 output tokens:
- Gemini 3.1 Pro (≤200K context):
- Input Cost: (150,000 / 1,000,000) * $2.00 = $0.30
- Output Cost: (3,000 / 1,000,000) * $12.00 = $0.036
- Total per task: $0.336
- Claude Sonnet 4.6:
- Input Cost: (150,000 / 1,000,000) * $3.00 = $0.45
- Output Cost: (3,000 / 1,000,000) * $15.00 = $0.045
- Total per task: $0.495
In this example, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a noticeable cost advantage. However, the final choice may depend on specific context length requirements and the need for multimodal inputs (where Gemini excels).
Best Use Cases:
Both models are excellent for building robust AI tutoring systems. Gemini 3.1 Pro is superior for tasks requiring extensive multimodal inputs or very large contexts, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a consistent, cost-effective solution for general agentic workflows and strong reasoning.