Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
Output: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 300,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Output Cost: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
- Total Cost: $0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000448
- Tokens per dollar: 2,233,857 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 41 minutes, 57.83 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.092250 (rounded ~ $0.09) Best Value | ↓ 74.2% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.110500 | ↓ 69.1% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.138125 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↓ 61.4% cheaper |
| #4 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.153500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 57.1% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 39.1% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 39.1% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) | Same price |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.452900 (rounded ~ $0.45) | ↑ 26.5% more |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.477500 (rounded ~ $0.48) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #10 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.952500 (rounded ~ $0.95) | ↑ 166% more |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.955000 (rounded ~ $0.96) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.955000 (rounded ~ $0.96) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$1.105000 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 208.6% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$1.105000 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 208.6% more |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$1.432500 (rounded ~ $1.43) | ↑ 300% more |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$1.905000 (rounded ~ $1.91) | ↑ 431.9% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.910000 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #18 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$2.020000 | ↑ 464% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$2.020000 | ↑ 464% more |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #21 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #22 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #24 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76) | ↑ 671.4% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$3.070000 | ↑ 757.2% more |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$3.070000 | ↑ 757.2% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$3.520000 | ↑ 882.9% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$4.400000 | ↑ 1128.6% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$4.400000 | ↑ 1128.6% more |
| #30 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76) | ↑ 1228.1% more |
| #31 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76) | ↑ 1228.1% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$8.800000 | ↑ 2357.2% more |
| #35 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$19.100000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
| #36 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$19.100000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Optimizing Personalized Outreach at Scale
For e-commerce store owners managing high-volume email marketing, efficiency is the primary driver. Gemini 3.8 Flash provides a robust foundation for this workload, particularly when you need to process large batches of customer data into personalized messaging. Its architecture is tuned for high throughput, making it an excellent choice for daily tasks where you are generating hundreds of unique emails simultaneously based on user browsing history or purchase data.
The main advantage for this specific application is the model’s high context window combined with its speed. When running a daily batch of 500 personalized emails, the system can digest the entire product catalog and customer preference dataset in a single pass. This ensures that the generated content maintains consistency across all recipients while respecting the unique constraints of each customer profile. Because this model supports efficient batch processing, it is highly suitable for workflows where you want to minimize the time between data ingestion and finalized email dispatch.
Choosing this model is ideal if your priority is balancing high-quality personalization with technical performance. While it is highly capable for standard marketing copy, the strength lies in its ability to handle repetitive, logic-heavy generation tasks without significant latency spikes. If your email strategy relies on templated personalization that requires frequent updates based on real-time inventory or customer behavior, this model offers the stability and speed required to maintain a seamless operational cadence.