Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
Output: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 300,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Output Cost: $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28)
- Total Cost: $0.332813 (rounded ~ $0.33)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000416
- Tokens per dollar: 2,403,756 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 41 minutes, 57.83 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.103750 (rounded ~ $0.10) Best Value | ↓ 68.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.129688 | ↓ 61% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.140000 | ↓ 57.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.208125 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.208125 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.332813 (rounded ~ $0.33) | Same price |
| #7 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.407000 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 22.3% more |
| #8 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.443750 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #9 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.881250 (rounded ~ $0.88) | ↑ 164.8% more |
| #10 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.887500 (rounded ~ $0.89) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.887500 (rounded ~ $0.89) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$1.037500 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 211.7% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$1.037500 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 211.7% more |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$1.331250 (rounded ~ $1.33) | ↑ 300% more |
| #15 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$1.750000 | ↑ 425.8% more |
| #16 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$1.750000 | ↑ 425.8% more |
| #17 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$1.762500 (rounded ~ $1.76) | ↑ 429.6% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.775000 (rounded ~ $1.78) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #19 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$2.218750 (rounded ~ $2.22) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$2.218750 (rounded ~ $2.22) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #21 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$2.218750 (rounded ~ $2.22) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #22 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$2.218750 (rounded ~ $2.22) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$2.593750 (rounded ~ $2.59) | ↑ 679.3% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$2.800000 | ↑ 741.3% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$2.800000 | ↑ 741.3% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$3.250000 | ↑ 876.5% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$4.062500 (rounded ~ $4.06) | ↑ 1120.7% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$4.062500 (rounded ~ $4.06) | ↑ 1120.7% more |
| #29 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.390625 | ↑ 1219.2% more |
| #30 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.390625 | ↑ 1219.2% more |
| #31 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$4.437500 (rounded ~ $4.44) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #32 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$4.437500 (rounded ~ $4.44) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$8.125000 (rounded ~ $8.13) | ↑ 2341.3% more |
| #34 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$17.750000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
| #35 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$17.750000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Optimizing Real-Time NPC Interactions
For indie developers, the challenge of creating immersive, dynamic NPC dialogue lies in balancing character consistency with the computational demands of high-frequency interaction. When you are managing a pipeline of personalized emails or conversational game assets at a scale of 500,000 tokens daily, efficiency becomes the primary concern. Gemini 3.8 Flash offers a compelling balance for this use case, providing low-latency responses that are critical for maintaining the illusion of a living, breathing game world.
Unlike heavier models that might introduce noticeable delay—potentially breaking player immersion—this model is designed specifically for rapid generation. Its architecture excels at processing the concise, context-heavy inputs often found in game dialogue trees or automated NPC-player messaging systems. By leveraging its reasoning capabilities, developers can ensure that NPCs not only respond quickly but also maintain coherent long-term memory of player actions without succumbing to the hallucinations often seen in smaller, less capable models.
Choosing this model is particularly beneficial when your game relies on multimodal inputs, allowing the system to interpret visual game state data alongside textual history. For indie teams operating within tight budgets, the focus should remain on performance-per-token efficiency. This allows you to scale your NPC populations without sacrificing the quality of interaction or the depth of the narrative. When evaluating your daily token volume, consider how the model’s speed directly impacts your infrastructure overhead, ensuring that your automated systems remain both responsive and sustainable for the long term.