Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000703
Output: $0.000703
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 15,000 input tokens and 750 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.002813
- Output Cost: $0.000703
- Total Cost: $0.001997
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000127
- Tokens per dollar: 7,887,324 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 47.43 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 333 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000533 Best Value | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000533 | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000570 | ↓ 71.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000713 | ↓ 64.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.000986 | ↓ 50.6% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000986 | ↓ 50.6% cheaper |
| #7 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001144 | ↓ 42.7% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.001997 | Same price |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.002138 | ↑ 7% more |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.002663 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.002850 | ↑ 42.7% more |
| #12 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.003130 | ↑ 56.7% more |
| #13 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005100 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 155.4% more |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.005325 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.005325 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.005644 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 182.6% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.005644 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 182.6% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.005700 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 185.4% more |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.007988 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 300% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.008063 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 303.8% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 320.7% more |
| #22 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 320.7% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.010200 | ↑ 410.8% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.010650 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.010650 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.010650 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.011400 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 470.9% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.013313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.013313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.013313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.013313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 613.6% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 613.6% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 613.6% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.024938 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1148.8% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.024938 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1148.8% more |
| #37 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #38 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1327.2% more |
| #40 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.053250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 2566.7% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.067725 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 3291.5% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.067725 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 3291.5% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Scaling Legal Discovery with Gemini 3.8 Flash
Legal discovery and due diligence require parsing massive volumes of unstructured data to identify relevant case law, clauses, or potential liabilities. For enterprise teams running Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, the challenge lies in maintaining high-speed throughput without sacrificing the nuance required for legal review. Gemini 3.8 Flash offers a compelling balance of speed and reasoning capacity, making it a strong candidate for high-frequency legal research tools.
When processing 15,000-token queries, the efficiency of the model becomes the primary lever for controlling infrastructure spend. Unlike larger, more compute-heavy models, Gemini 3.8 Flash is designed to handle high-volume, repetitive tasks—such as summarizing thousands of contracts or flagging compliance risks in real-time—with significantly lower latency. This responsiveness is critical in production environments where attorneys or compliance officers are waiting on live feedback during active document review sessions.
Beyond raw speed, the model’s ability to maintain coherent context over long RAG-based conversations allows for deeper iterative questioning. In legal workflows, being able to follow up on a specific clause without re-indexing the entire dataset provides a competitive edge in productivity. While specialized reasoning models might offer marginal improvements in complex logic, the operational overhead of those models often creates bottlenecks in large-scale pipelines. For enterprise architects, choosing a model like Gemini 3.8 Flash for these 15,000-token workflows provides the necessary throughput to handle massive document repositories while remaining performant under heavy, concurrent load.