Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000469
Output: $0.000469
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.000188
- Output Cost: $0.000469
- Total Cost: $0.000572
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000381
- Tokens per dollar: 2,622,951 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4.90 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI
|
$0.000051 Best Value | ↓ 91% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI
|
$0.000053 | ↓ 90.8% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.000144 | ↓ 74.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000153 | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000153 | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000178 | ↓ 69% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000222 | ↓ 61.2% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000256 | ↓ 55.2% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.000354 | ↓ 38.1% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000354 | ↓ 38.1% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.000572 | Same price |
| #12 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.000666 | ↑ 16.4% more |
| #13 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.000710 | ↑ 24.1% more |
| #14 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000763 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.000888 | ↑ 55.2% more |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.001513 | ↑ 164.5% more |
| #17 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.001525 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #18 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.001525 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.001550 | ↑ 171% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.001550 | ↑ 171% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.001775 | ↑ 210.4% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.001991 | ↑ 248.1% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.001991 | ↑ 248.1% more |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.002288 | ↑ 300% more |
| #25 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.002844 | ↑ 397.3% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.003025 | ↑ 429% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.003050 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.003050 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.003050 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #30 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.003550 | ↑ 520.8% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.003813 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.003813 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.003813 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.003813 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.004438 | ↑ 676% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.004438 | ↑ 676% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.004438 | ↑ 676% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.007531 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1216.9% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.007531 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1216.9% more |
| #40 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #41 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1451.9% more |
| #43 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 2566.7% more |
| #44 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.023888 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 4077% more |
| #45 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.023888 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 4077% more |
Voxtral Small 24B Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (14B) Mistral AI
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
When executing large-scale newsletter personalization, the primary constraint is maintaining consistent quality across tens of thousands of unique recipients without ballooning infrastructure latency. Gemini 3.8 Flash offers a compelling balance for this workload, providing the necessary throughput to handle high-frequency, per-subscriber generation tasks effectively.
For personalized newsletters, the model needs to synthesize subscriber metadata—such as past purchase behavior, engagement history, and demographic data—into a natural-language introduction that feels tailored rather than generic. Gemini 3.8 Flash excels here by maintaining a tight instruction-following capability, ensuring that the tone remains consistent with brand guidelines while allowing for high variability in the personalized content.
Consultants evaluating this model should consider its performance in batch-processing environments. Because email campaigns are often scheduled in large bursts, the ability to utilize efficient ingestion pipelines is critical. Gemini 3.8 Flash’s architectural optimization for text-heavy tasks makes it particularly well-suited for high-volume content generation where the model is invoked repeatedly in short intervals.
Beyond raw generation, consider how the model handles context injection. Personalized newsletters rely heavily on provided context; the model’s ability to parse this data accurately is paramount. Unlike heavier reasoning models that might introduce unnecessary latency for simple personalization tasks, this model is engineered for speed, allowing teams to scale their outreach without sacrificing the responsiveness of their delivery pipelines. This makes it a primary contender for enterprise marketing automation where reliability and speed are the top operational priorities.