Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000750
Output: $0.000750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500 input tokens and 800 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.000094
- Output Cost: $0.000750
- Total Cost: $0.000802
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000617
- Tokens per dollar: 1,621,832 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4.27 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI
|
$0.000054 Best Value | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI
|
$0.000067 | ↓ 91.7% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.000185 | ↓ 77% cheaper |
| #4 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000214 | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000214 | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000254 | ↓ 68.3% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000317 | ↓ 60.4% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000334 | ↓ 58.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.000521 | ↓ 35% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000521 | ↓ 35% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.000802 | Same price |
| #12 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.000930 | ↑ 16% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.000952 | ↑ 18.7% more |
| #14 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.001069 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.001269 | ↑ 58.3% more |
| #16 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.001875 | ↑ 133.9% more |
| #17 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.001875 | ↑ 133.9% more |
| #18 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.002131 | ↑ 165.9% more |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.002138 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.002138 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.002538 | ↑ 216.6% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.002920 | ↑ 264.3% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.002920 | ↑ 264.3% more |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.003206 | ↑ 300% more |
| #25 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.004172 | ↑ 420.5% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.004263 | ↑ 431.8% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.004275 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.004275 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.004275 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #30 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 533.1% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.005344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.005344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.005344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.005344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.006344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 691.4% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.006344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 691.4% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.006344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 691.4% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.010641 | ↑ 1227.5% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.010641 | ↑ 1227.5% more |
| #40 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.010688 | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #41 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.010688 | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.012688 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 1482.8% more |
| #43 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.021375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 2566.7% more |
| #44 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.035044 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 4271.9% more |
| #45 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.035044 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 4271.9% more |
Ministral 3 (14B) Mistral AI
Voxtral Small 24B Mistral AI
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Gemini 3.8 Flash has become a standard choice for ecommerce founders needing rapid, high-volume content generation. The key advantage for this model in a bulk product description pipeline is its extreme efficiency. When you are processing 5,000 descriptions, latency and cost-per-call are the primary bottlenecks, and Gemini 3.8 Flash is purpose-built to handle these constraints effectively.
For ecommerce startups, the ability to rapidly churn through product catalogs is critical for SEO and site enrichment. This model excels at processing structured input data—such as CSV or JSON product attributes—and outputting consistent, SEO-friendly descriptions. Unlike heavier models that may introduce unnecessary latency or cost for simple copy tasks, this model delivers reliable performance that integrates seamlessly into automated workflows.
Founders should also consider the multimodal nature of this model. If your workflow eventually evolves to include automated image tagging or visual content analysis alongside text generation, the underlying architecture is already prepared for that transition. It provides a stable, predictable output that reduces the need for manual oversight and editing. For a solo founder optimizing an MVP for the cheapest workable model while maintaining professional output, this platform offers a balanced solution that avoids the feature bloat found in more expensive, specialized models. It is an ideal baseline for building a scalable content engine.