Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.003750
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 15,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.003750
- Total Cost: $0.009938
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000621
- Tokens per dollar: 1,610,063 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 50.53 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001125 Best Value | ↓ 88.7% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.003150 | ↓ 68.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.003563 | ↓ 64.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.004975 | ↓ 49.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.004975 | ↓ 49.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 43.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.007125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 28.3% cheaper |
| #8 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.008265 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 16.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.010250 | ↑ 3.1% more |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.010688 | ↑ 7.5% more |
| #11 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.012250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 23.3% more |
| #12 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.012336 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 24.1% more |
| #13 |
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
|
$0.012336 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 24.1% more |
| #14 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 28.9% more |
| #15 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 28.9% more |
| #16 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.013250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #17 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.013475 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 35.6% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 43.4% more |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.019875 | ↑ 100% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.020313 | ↑ 104.4% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.021375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 115.1% more |
| #22 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 126.4% more |
| #23 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 126.4% more |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #25 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 186.2% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 186.2% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 186.8% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 258.5% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 258.5% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 258.5% more |
| #31 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.039750 | ↑ 300% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 617% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 617% more |
| #38 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 617% more |
| #39 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 1132.7% more |
| #40 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 1176.7% more |
| #41 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 1176.7% more |
| #42 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #43 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #44 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #45 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.245000 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 2365.4% more |
| #46 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 3334% more |
| #47 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 3334% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Retail customer support teams frequently face a balancing act: providing accurate, context-aware responses to product inquiries while managing the high costs of real-time AI interactions. Gemini 3.8 Flash has emerged as a compelling choice for these RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) workloads, particularly for chatbots that must ingest large amounts of product documentation, size guides, and return policies per query.
What makes this model particularly effective for retail environments is its optimized attention mechanism, which is designed to handle the multi-step reasoning often required to navigate complex return policies or inventory status checks. Unlike earlier flash-tier models that might struggle with the nuances of brand tone or specific policy exceptions, this iteration demonstrates a marked improvement in instruction following and output reliability. When a user asks about a specific size or fit, the model can effectively parse retrieved documentation, verify against current inventory metadata, and maintain a consistent, helpful tone.
For marketing and support managers, the decision to pivot to this model often centers on its latency-to-performance ratio. Because retail support requires near-instant gratification to prevent customer churn, the model’s ability to handle 15K-token input windows without significant latency spikes is a distinct advantage. Furthermore, its proficiency with tool calling makes it a natural fit for connecting to existing e-commerce databases, allowing the chatbot to do more than just summarize text—it can act as a bridge between the customer and the store’s backend systems.