Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001875
Output: $0.001875
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Output Cost: $0.001875
- Total Cost: $0.053438 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000106
- Tokens per dollar: 9,394,152 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 26 minutes, 20.00 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.250000
- Output Cost: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001326
- Tokens per dollar: 754,178 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 210 tokens per second and 430ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 42 minutes, 37.99 seconds
- Latency: 430 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 210 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 196 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Fable 5.1. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash | vs Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.017938 (rounded ~ $0.02) Best Value | ↓ 66.4% cheaper | ↓ 97.3% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 59.1% cheaper | ↓ 96.7% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 59.1% cheaper | ↓ 96.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.071750 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 34.3% more | ↓ 89.2% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.106875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 100% more | ↓ 83.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.107625 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 101.4% more | ↓ 83.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↓ 78.6% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.143500 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 168.5% more | ↓ 78.4% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.179375 | ↑ 235.7% more | ↓ 73.1% cheaper |
| #10 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.213750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 300% more | ↓ 67.9% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↓ 46.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↓ 46.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↓ 46.5% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.356250 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↓ 46.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 571.3% more | ↓ 46.1% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.358750 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 571.3% more | ↓ 46.1% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 944.2% more | ↓ 16.2% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.558000 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 944.2% more | ↓ 16.2% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.568000 (rounded ~ $0.57) | ↑ 962.9% more | ↓ 14.7% cheaper |
| #20 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67) | ↑ 1145.6% more | Same price |
| #21 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.665625 (rounded ~ $0.67) | ↑ 1145.6% more | Same price |
| #22 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.710000 | ↑ 1228.7% more | ↑ 6.7% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.710000 | ↑ 1228.7% more | ↑ 6.7% more |
| #24 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71) | ↑ 1233.3% more | ↑ 7% more |
| #25 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.712500 (rounded ~ $0.71) | ↑ 1233.3% more | ↑ 7% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.420000 | ↑ 2557.3% more | ↑ 113.3% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$2.850000 | ↑ 5233.3% more | ↑ 328.2% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$2.850000 | ↑ 5233.3% more | ↑ 328.2% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
For educational content creators managing large-scale curriculum design, the choice between these two models often comes down to the balance between high-speed iteration and complex structural reasoning. Gemini 3.8 Flash is exceptionally well-suited for rapid prototyping of lesson outlines and generating bulk practice material, where the primary need is throughput and maintaining a consistent, accessible instructional tone. Its native ability to handle multi-modal inputs is a significant advantage if your curriculum includes visual aids, diagrams, or existing lecture videos that need to be transcribed and adapted into text-based lessons.
Claude Fable 5.1, conversely, acts as a more rigorous editorial partner. When developing long-form video scripts or comprehensive course modules that require deep thematic consistency, Claude Fable 5.1 excels at maintaining a specific pedagogical voice across thousands of tokens. While Gemini 3.8 Flash is the workhorse for high-volume, repetitive tasks—such as generating quiz banks or summarizing feedback—Claude Fable 5.1 provides the nuanced reasoning needed for complex narrative arcs in video storytelling. If your workflow involves creating long-form educational scripts that must balance entertainment with academic accuracy, Claude Fable 5.1 often requires less manual intervention to reach the final draft. Evaluate your current bottleneck: if you are struggling with content volume, lean into the speed of Gemini; if the challenge is content depth and tone alignment, Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger investment for your production pipeline.