Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 for 100K-Token KB

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3
Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 500 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta AI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 100,000 100,000
Output Tokens 500 500
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)Best $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)Worst
Output Cost $0.000469Best $0.002125Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.010781 Best Value $0.127125 (rounded ~ $0.13) Most Expensive
Processing Time 5 minutes, 16.46 seconds Fastest 5 minutes, 36.23 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second 340Fastest 320Slowest
Time to First Token 105ms Best 150ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000107Best $0.001265Worst
Tokens per Dollar 9,321,739Best Value 790,560Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best $1.250000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $0.937500 (rounded ~ $0.94)Best $4.250000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$1.250000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.468750 (rounded ~ $0.47)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$4.250000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Video Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Audio Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported requested
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Gemini 3.8 Flash

GoogleMax Context: 1,048,576 tokens
$0.75 / $3.75 per 1M tokens
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.009375 Input Cost
$0.000469 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
100,500Total Tokens
$0.000107Cost per 1K
9,321,739Tokens per $

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

5m 16s Processing Time
340 Tokens/Second
105ms Time to First Token
318 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes


📚 Research & Citations

Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576

$0.010781
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✓ Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✓ Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.019219 Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.000469
Optimized Cost $0.010781 Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.000469
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.008438 (rounded ~ $0.01) 43.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Output Cost: $0.000469
  • Total Cost: $0.010781
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000107
  • Tokens per dollar: 9,321,739 tokens
  • Context Window: 1048576 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 5 minutes, 16.46 seconds
  • Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Efficientscalable internal Q&A pipelines; Gemini 3.8 Flash for multimodal contexts and Muse Spark 1.3 for text-intensive reasoning.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta AI

$0.127125 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
⚡
Caching
✗ Not Available

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.127125 (rounded ~ $0.13) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.002125
Optimized Cost $0.127125 (rounded ~ $0.13) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.002125
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
  • Output Cost: $0.002125
  • Total Cost: $0.127125 (rounded ~ $0.13)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001265
  • Tokens per dollar: 790,560 tokens
  • Context Window: 262144 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 320 tokens per second and 150ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 5 minutes, 36.23 seconds
  • Latency: 150 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 320 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 299 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Efficientscalable internal Q&A pipelines; Gemini 3.8 Flash for multimodal contexts and Muse Spark 1.3 for text-intensive reasoning.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Muse Spark 1.3. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 500
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3
🏆 Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
$0.002875 Best Value ↓ 73.3% cheaper ↓ 97.7% cheaper
🥈 GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.002875 ↓ 73.3% cheaper ↓ 97.7% cheaper
🥉 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.002900 ↓ 73.1% cheaper ↓ 97.7% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.003625 ↓ 66.4% cheaper ↓ 97.1% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.004438 ↓ 58.8% cheaper ↓ 96.5% cheaper
#6 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.004438 ↓ 58.8% cheaper ↓ 96.5% cheaper
#7 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 34.5% cheaper ↓ 94.4% cheaper
#8 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.010781 Same price ↓ 91.5% cheaper
#9 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.010875 ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 91.4% cheaper
#10 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 33.3% more ↓ 88.7% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 34.5% more ↓ 88.6% cheaper
#12 Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
$0.019223 ↑ 78.3% more ↓ 84.9% cheaper
#13 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 139.4% more ↓ 79.7% cheaper
#14 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 139.4% more ↓ 79.7% cheaper
#15 Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
$0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 155.1% more ↓ 78.4% cheaper
#16 Gemini 4 Argon
Google
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 166.7% more ↓ 77.4% cheaper
#17 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 166.7% more ↓ 77.4% cheaper
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.029000 ↑ 169% more ↓ 77.2% cheaper
#19 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 242% more ↓ 71% cheaper
#20 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 300% more ↓ 66.1% cheaper
#21 Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 410.1% more ↓ 56.7% cheaper
#22 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.056000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 419.4% more ↓ 55.9% cheaper
#23 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.056000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 419.4% more ↓ 55.9% cheaper
#24 GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 433.3% more ↓ 54.8% cheaper
#25 GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 433.3% more ↓ 54.8% cheaper
#26 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 433.3% more ↓ 54.8% cheaper
#27 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 438% more ↓ 54.4% cheaper
#28 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 566.7% more ↓ 43.5% cheaper
#29 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 566.7% more ↓ 43.5% cheaper
#30 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 566.7% more ↓ 43.5% cheaper
#31 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 566.7% more ↓ 43.5% cheaper
#32 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 572.5% more ↓ 43% cheaper
#33 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 572.5% more ↓ 43% cheaper
#34 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 572.5% more ↓ 43% cheaper
#35 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.134375 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 1146.4% more ↑ 5.7% more
#36 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.134375 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 1146.4% more ↑ 5.7% more
#37 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↑ 1233.3% more ↑ 13.1% more
#38 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↑ 1233.3% more ↑ 13.1% more
#39 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 1244.9% more ↑ 14.1% more
#40 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↑ 2566.7% more ↑ 126.2% more
#41 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.309750 ↑ 2773% more ↑ 143.7% more
#42 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.309750 ↑ 2773% more ↑ 143.7% more
🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.002875
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 73.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 97.7%
🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.002875
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 73.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 97.7%
🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.002900
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 73.1%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 97.7%
#4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003625
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 66.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 97.1%
#5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004438
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 58.8%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 96.5%
#6

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004438
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 58.8%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 96.5%
#7

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↓ 34.5%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 94.4%
#8

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.010781
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: Same
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 91.5%
#9

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.010875
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 0.9%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 91.4%
#10

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 33.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 88.7%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 34.5%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 88.6%
#12

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.019223
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 78.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 84.9%
#13

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 139.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 79.7%
#14

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 139.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 79.7%
#15

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

$0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 155.1%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 78.4%
#16

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 166.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 77.4%
#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 166.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 77.4%
#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.029000
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 169%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 77.2%
#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 242%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 71%
#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 300%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 66.1%
#21

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 410.1%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 56.7%
#22

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.056000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 419.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 55.9%
#23

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.056000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 419.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 55.9%
#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 433.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 54.8%
#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 433.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 54.8%
#26

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 433.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 54.8%
#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 438%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 54.4%
#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43.5%
#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43.5%
#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43.5%
#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43.5%
#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 572.5%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43%
#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 572.5%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43%
#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 572.5%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↓ 43%
#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.134375 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 1146.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 5.7%
#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.134375 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 1146.4%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 5.7%
#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 13.1%
#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 13.1%
#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 1244.9%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 14.1%
#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 2566.7%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 126.2%
#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.309750
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 2773%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 143.7%
#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.309750
vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: ↑ 2773%
vs Muse Spark 1.3: ↑ 143.7%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

When evaluating models for internal knowledge base Q&A, the primary trade-off is often between the raw reasoning power of flagship models and the cost-efficiency required for scaling to larger teams. Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 offer compelling value for 100K-token workloads, but they excel in different areas. Gemini 3.8 Flash is a highly versatile workhorse, particularly suited for multimodal environments where your internal knowledge base might include not just text documents, but also embedded charts, diagrams, or even video transcripts from company meetings. Its ability to process these inputs natively provides a distinct advantage in search-heavy applications where employees are looking for information locked in non-text formats.

In contrast, Muse Spark 1.3 is an excellent choice for teams focused on pure text-based reasoning and structured analysis. If your knowledge base is primarily composed of lengthy policy documents, standard operating procedures, or technical manuals, this model offers a highly efficient path to accurate answers without the overhead of unnecessary multimodal features. It excels in tasks that demand consistent, predictable logic, making it a strong contender for strictly text-driven Q&A systems. Choosing between them often comes down to your content mix: opt for Gemini 3.8 Flash if your repository is rich with media and diverse data types, or select Muse Spark 1.3 if your focus is on high-performance text reasoning. Both models provide the scalability necessary to keep costs manageable as your internal Q&A system grows across the organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.