GPT-5.4 OpenAI 1024000 🏔️ Context Cliff
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
Output: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.250000
- Output Cost: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
- Total Cost: $1.193750 (rounded ~ $1.19)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002318
- Tokens per dollar: 431,414 tokens
- Context Window: 1024000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 420 tokens per second and 210ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 21 minutes, 52.20 seconds
- Latency: 210 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 420 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 393 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value | ↓ 97.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.040125 | ↓ 96.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.040125 | ↓ 96.6% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.090938 | ↓ 92.4% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 89.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.181875 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 84.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19) | ↓ 84.3% cheaper |
| #8 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.242500 (rounded ~ $0.24) | ↓ 79.7% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.250000 | ↓ 79.1% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↓ 73.8% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.363750 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↓ 69.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.606250 (rounded ~ $0.61) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.606250 (rounded ~ $0.61) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.606250 (rounded ~ $0.61) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.606250 (rounded ~ $0.61) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #16 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63) | ↓ 47.6% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63) | ↓ 47.6% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.880000 | ↓ 26.3% cheaper |
| #19 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.880000 | ↓ 26.3% cheaper |
| #20 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.955000 (rounded ~ $0.96) | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #21 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$1.193750 (rounded ~ $1.19) | Same price |
| #22 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.193750 (rounded ~ $1.19) | Same price |
| #23 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.193750 (rounded ~ $1.19) | Same price |
| #24 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$1.212500 (rounded ~ $1.21) | ↑ 1.6% more |
| #25 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$1.212500 (rounded ~ $1.21) | ↑ 1.6% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) | ↑ 100% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.850000 | ↑ 306.3% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.850000 | ↑ 306.3% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Optimizing High-Volume Research Workflows
For solo founders and researchers managing large-scale literature reviews, the primary challenge is maintaining coherence across extensive document sets. GPT-5.4 offers a balanced approach for these 500,000-token batches, providing robust reasoning capabilities that handle complex synthesis without the overhead of more specialized, compute-heavy reasoning models.
When drafting long-form content, the ability to maintain context is vital. GPT-5.4 excels in tasks requiring structural adherence and factual grounding, making it a reliable choice for drafting literature reviews where maintaining the logical flow of academic arguments is paramount. Its architecture is particularly well-suited for summarizing dense, multi-source research materials into coherent, actionable summaries.
When to choose this model:
- For high-volume drafting tasks where consistent output structure is more important than extreme-depth reasoning.
- When balancing budget constraints with the need for a frontier-class model capable of handling large input contexts (up to 1M tokens) efficiently.