GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000900
Output: $0.000900
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 800 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Output Cost: $0.000900
- Total Cost: $0.019650
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000195
- Tokens per dollar: 5,129,771 tokens
- Context Window: 400000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 35.89 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002560 Best Value | ↓ 87% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.002560 | ↓ 87% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.005300 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 73% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.006550 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI
|
$0.007664 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 61% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 59.3% cheaper |
| #7 |
Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI
|
$0.008240 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 58.1% cheaper |
| #8 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.010180 | ↓ 48.2% cheaper |
| #9 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.012800 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 34.9% cheaper |
| #10 |
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
|
$0.015480 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 21.2% cheaper |
| #11 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.025800 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 31.3% more |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.026000 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 32.3% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.026200 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #14 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.028380 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 44.4% more |
| #15 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.031750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 61.6% more |
| #16 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.039300 | ↑ 100% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.046550 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 136.9% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.046550 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 136.9% more |
| #19 |
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
|
$0.051000 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 159.5% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.051200 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 160.6% more |
| #21 |
Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI
|
$0.060960 | ↑ 210.2% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.066500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 238.4% more |
| #23 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.078000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 296.9% more |
| #24 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.104800 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.130000 | ↑ 561.6% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.130000 | ↑ 561.6% more |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.130000 | ↑ 561.6% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.131000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.131000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.131000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.258000 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 1213% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.262000 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #33 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.516000 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 2526% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.558600 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 2742.7% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.786000 (rounded ~ $0.79) | ↑ 3900% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.786000 (rounded ~ $0.79) | ↑ 3900% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Nemotron 3 Super Mistral AI
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Llama 4 Scout Meta AI
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Magistral Medium Mistral AI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Llama 3.3 70B Meta AI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
Evaluating OpenAI’s Cost-Effective Text Generation
For mobile app developers focusing on rapid prototyping and MVP development, understanding the cost-performance of individual models is vital. This record examines OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 mini, a model positioned for efficient text generation, focusing on a volume of up to 100,000 tokens.
GPT-5.4 mini offers a balanced approach, providing access to OpenAI’s advanced architecture at a more accessible price point than its flagship counterparts. It’s well-suited for tasks requiring high-quality output for product descriptions, marketing copy, or user-generated content summarization, where efficiency is as important as quality.
Developers choosing GPT-5.4 mini benefit from OpenAI’s mature ecosystem and robust API, simplifying integration into mobile applications. Its context window is sufficient for many common content generation tasks, offering a reliable performance baseline.
When considering GPT-5.4 mini, factors like familiarity with the OpenAI platform, the need for a well-rounded model that balances cost and capability, and the project’s overall budget for AI services are key decision points. It represents a pragmatic choice for developers seeking dependable text generation within the OpenAI suite.