GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001125
Output: $0.001125
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 20,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.003750
- Output Cost: $0.001125
- Total Cost: $0.003188
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000152
- Tokens per dollar: 6,588,235 tokens
- Context Window: 400000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 44.28 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 476 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000350 Best Value | ↓ 89% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.001063 | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.001450 | ↓ 54.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.001450 | ↓ 54.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001750 | ↓ 45.1% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.003000 | ↓ 5.9% cheaper |
| #7 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.003750 | ↑ 17.6% more |
| #8 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.004000 | ↑ 25.5% more |
| #9 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.004125 | ↑ 29.4% more |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.004250 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #11 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.004250 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 88.2% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.006375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 100% more |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 151% more |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.008313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 160.8% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.008313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 160.8% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.010625 | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.011875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 272.5% more |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 276.5% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.013000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 307.8% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.013000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 307.8% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.017000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.020000 | ↑ 527.5% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.020000 | ↑ 527.5% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.020000 | ↑ 527.5% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.020000 | ↑ 527.5% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 1076.5% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 1096.1% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 1096.1% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.040000 | ↑ 1154.9% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.040000 | ↑ 1154.9% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 2252.9% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.080000 | ↑ 2409.8% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.099750 | ↑ 3029.4% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.099750 | ↑ 3029.4% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Scaling Intelligent Summarization
As EdTech platforms scale to support millions of students, the economics of AI-driven post-meeting summarization become a central engineering challenge. Generating concise, accurate, and age-appropriate summaries for 1 million meetings monthly requires a model that strikes an optimal balance between reasoning capabilities and cost-efficiency.
GPT-5.4 mini is positioned as a high-performance workhorse for structured extraction tasks. For meeting summaries, the primary requirement is the ability to parse long transcripts, identify key learning outcomes, and distill actionable next steps without the overhead associated with larger, more expensive frontier models. Its reasoning capabilities are specifically tuned to follow precise instructions, ensuring that summaries remain consistent, safe, and aligned with pedagogical standards across diverse subjects.
From an architectural perspective, utilizing a compact yet capable model allows for high-concurrency processing, which is essential for end-of-class workflows when thousands of sessions conclude simultaneously. By offloading summarization to GPT-5.4 mini, teams can preserve higher-tier models for complex student-AI interactions, such as personalized tutoring or adaptive feedback loops. This tiered strategy not only optimizes your budget but also minimizes latency, providing users with instant summaries immediately following their sessions. For product managers evaluating deployment, the key success factor is defining clear system prompts and few-shot examples that leverage the model’s strengths in structured output generation, ensuring that meeting notes remain a high-value, low-friction asset for every user.