GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.003600
Output: $0.003600
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 800 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Output Cost: $0.003600
- Total Cost: $0.061725 (rounded ~ $0.06)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000612
- Tokens per dollar: 1,633,050 tokens
- Context Window: 400000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 31.86 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 476 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001000
Output: $0.001000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 800 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Output Cost: $0.001000
- Total Cost: $0.020375
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000202
- Tokens per dollar: 4,947,239 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 2 minutes, 4.70 seconds
- Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 810 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 mini | vs Claude Haiku 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.007990 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 87.1% cheaper | ↓ 60.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.016700 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 72.9% cheaper | ↓ 18% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.020575 | ↓ 66.7% cheaper | ↑ 1% more |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.025250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 59.1% cheaper | ↑ 23.9% more |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.025250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 59.1% cheaper | ↑ 23.9% more |
| #6 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.039950 | ↓ 35.3% cheaper | ↑ 96.1% more |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.041150 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 33.3% cheaper | ↑ 102% more |
| #8 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.049950 | ↓ 19.1% cheaper | ↑ 145.2% more |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.061125 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 1% cheaper | ↑ 200% more |
| #10 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.078488 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.2% more | ↑ 285.2% more |
| #11 |
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
|
$0.078488 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.2% more | ↑ 285.2% more |
| #12 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.079100 | ↑ 28.1% more | ↑ 288.2% more |
| #13 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.080700 | ↑ 30.7% more | ↑ 296.1% more |
| #14 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.081500 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 32% more | ↑ 300% more |
| #15 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.082300 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 33.3% more | ↑ 303.9% more |
| #16 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.088770 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 43.8% more | ↑ 335.7% more |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.098875 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 60.2% more | ↑ 385.3% more |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.098875 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 60.2% more | ↑ 385.3% more |
| #19 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.104875 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 69.9% more | ↑ 414.7% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.122250 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 98.1% more | ↑ 500% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.123450 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 505.9% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.146825 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 137.9% more | ↑ 620.6% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.146825 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 137.9% more | ↑ 620.6% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.159800 | ↑ 158.9% more | ↑ 684.3% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.159800 | ↑ 158.9% more | ↑ 684.3% more |
| #26 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.163000 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 164.1% more | ↑ 700% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.164600 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↑ 707.9% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.205750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 233.3% more | ↑ 909.8% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.205750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 233.3% more | ↑ 909.8% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.205750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 233.3% more | ↑ 909.8% more |
| #31 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.244500 (rounded ~ $0.24) | ↑ 296.1% more | ↑ 1100% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.407500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 560.2% more | ↑ 1900% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.407500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 560.2% more | ↑ 1900% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.407500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 560.2% more | ↑ 1900% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.407500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 560.2% more | ↑ 1900% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.411500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 1919.6% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.411500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 1919.6% more |
| #38 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.411500 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 1919.6% more |
| #39 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.796250 (rounded ~ $0.80) | ↑ 1190% more | ↑ 3808% more |
| #40 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.796250 (rounded ~ $0.80) | ↑ 1190% more | ↑ 3808% more |
| #41 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.807000 (rounded ~ $0.81) | ↑ 1207.4% more | ↑ 3860.7% more |
| #42 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.815000 (rounded ~ $0.82) | ↑ 1220.4% more | ↑ 3900% more |
| #43 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.815000 (rounded ~ $0.82) | ↑ 1220.4% more | ↑ 3900% more |
| #44 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.815000 (rounded ~ $0.82) | ↑ 1220.4% more | ↑ 3900% more |
| #45 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.614000 (rounded ~ $1.61) | ↑ 2514.8% more | ↑ 7821.5% more |
| #46 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.761900 (rounded ~ $1.76) | ↑ 2754.4% more | ↑ 8547.4% more |
| #47 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.761900 (rounded ~ $1.76) | ↑ 2754.4% more | ↑ 8547.4% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Reasoning vs. Tone in Pilot Deployments
When launching a 100K-token customer support pilot, choosing between specialized small models like GPT-5.4 mini and Claude Haiku 4.6 often comes down to the specific nature of the interaction. GPT-5.4 mini introduces advanced reasoning and ‘thinking’ capabilities into the lightweight tier. This makes it particularly effective for support workflows that require multi-step logic, such as troubleshooting technical issues or navigating complex internal policy trees. If your chatbot needs to act as a logic engine that executes various functions or tools, the OpenAI ecosystem provides a very mature developer experience.
Conversely, Claude Haiku 4.6 is frequently cited by support leads for its superior ‘human’ tone and its ability to follow strict stylistic guidelines without sounding overly repetitive. In multilingual scenarios, Haiku often demonstrates a more nuanced grasp of cultural idioms and formal vs. informal addressing, which is vital for maintaining brand reputation during escalation handling. It is also exceptionally fast, providing the near-instantaneous feedback that users expect from modern chat interfaces.
For developers, the decision between these two often hinges on the priority of the workload. If the bot is primarily a reasoning agent for technical support, the GPT-5.4 mini thinking capabilities offer a distinct advantage. If the bot is the front-line face of a global brand where tone, safety, and multilingual fluidness are paramount, Claude Haiku 4.6 remains a gold standard for pilot deployments.