GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 for 128K-Token Video Script Pipelines

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has been replaced by Claude Sonnet 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Sonnet 5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Complete Comparison: 128,000 input tokens × 8,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 20% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 20% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria GPT-5.4 Mini
OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (20% cached)
Input Tokens 128,000 128,000
Output Tokens 8,000 8,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)Best $0.096000 (rounded ~ $0.10)Worst
Output Cost $0.009000Best $0.030000Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.028680 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value $0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11) Most Expensive
Processing Time 4 minutes, 51.22 seconds Fastest 5 minutes, 23.56 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second 500Fastest 450Slowest
Time to First Token 180ms Best 200ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000211Best $0.000799Worst
Tokens per Dollar 4,741,980Best Value 1,250,920Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best $0.750000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Best $3.750000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
20
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAIMax Context: 400,000 tokens
$0.75 / $4.5 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
20%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.028680 Total Cost
$0.019200 Input Cost
$0.009000 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
136,000Total Tokens
$0.000211Cost per 1K
4,741,980Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

4m 51s Processing Time
500 Tokens/Second
180ms Time to First Token
467 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

GPT-5.4 Mini OpenAI

$0.028680 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Total Cost
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.033000 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.009000
Optimized Cost $0.028680 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.009000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.004320 13.1% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 128,000 input tokens and 8,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Output Cost: $0.009000
  • Total Cost: $0.028680 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000211
  • Tokens per dollar: 4,741,980 tokens
  • Context Window: 400000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 4 minutes, 51.22 seconds
  • Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

GPT-5.4 Mini is best for high-volumetemplated internal training scripts. Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels at nuanced patient-facing education requiring high-fidelity tone.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 Mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

$0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11)
Total Cost
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.126000 (rounded ~ $0.13) Input: $0.096000 (rounded ~ $0.10)
Output: $0.030000
Optimized Cost $0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11) Input: $0.096000 (rounded ~ $0.10)
Output: $0.030000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.017280 (rounded ~ $0.02) 13.7% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 128,000 input tokens and 8,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.096000 (rounded ~ $0.10)
  • Output Cost: $0.030000
  • Total Cost: $0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000799
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,250,920 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 5 minutes, 23.56 seconds
  • Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 421 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

GPT-5.4 Mini is best for high-volumetemplated internal training scripts. Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels at nuanced patient-facing education requiring high-fidelity tone.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to GPT-5.4 Mini
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 128,000
Output Tokens: 8,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 20%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.009560 Best Value ↓ 66.7% cheaper ↓ 91.2% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.012872 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 55.1% cheaper ↓ 88.2% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.012872 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 55.1% cheaper ↓ 88.2% cheaper
#4 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.016120 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 43.8% cheaper ↓ 85.2% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.027180 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 5.2% cheaper ↓ 75% cheaper
#6 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.036240 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 26.4% more ↓ 66.7% cheaper
#7 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.037664 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 31.3% more ↓ 65.4% cheaper
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.038240 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 33.3% more ↓ 64.8% cheaper
#9 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.038240 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 33.3% more ↓ 64.8% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.054360 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 89.5% more ↓ 50% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.057360 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 100% more ↓ 47.2% cheaper
#12 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.072480 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 152.7% more ↓ 33.3% cheaper
#13 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.073920 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 157.7% more ↓ 32% cheaper
#14 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.095600 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 233.3% more ↓ 12.1% cheaper
#15 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.105600 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 268.2% more ↓ 2.9% cheaper
#16 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 279.1% more Same price
#17 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.120960 ↑ 321.8% more ↑ 11.3% more
#18 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.120960 ↑ 321.8% more ↑ 11.3% more
#19 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.152960 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 433.3% more ↑ 40.7% more
#20 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 531.8% more ↑ 66.7% more
#21 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 531.8% more ↑ 66.7% more
#22 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 531.8% more ↑ 66.7% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 531.8% more ↑ 66.7% more
#24 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 75.9% more
#25 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 75.9% more
#26 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 75.9% more
#27 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 75.9% more
#28 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.342400 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 1093.9% more ↑ 214.9% more
#29 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.357600 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 1146.9% more ↑ 228.9% more
#30 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.357600 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 1146.9% more ↑ 228.9% more
#31 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.362400 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 1163.6% more ↑ 233.3% more
#32 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.362400 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 1163.6% more ↑ 233.3% more
#33 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.382400 (rounded ~ $0.38) ↑ 1233.3% more ↑ 251.7% more
#34 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.684800 (rounded ~ $0.68) ↑ 2287.7% more ↑ 529.9% more
#35 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.724800 (rounded ~ $0.72) ↑ 2427.2% more ↑ 566.7% more
#36 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.724800 (rounded ~ $0.72) ↑ 2427.2% more ↑ 566.7% more
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.009560
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↓ 66.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 91.2%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.012872 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↓ 55.1%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 88.2%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.012872 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↓ 55.1%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 88.2%
#4

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.016120 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↓ 43.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 85.2%
#5

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.027180 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↓ 5.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%
#6

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.036240 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 26.4%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.7%
#7

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.037664 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 31.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 65.4%
#8

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.038240 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 33.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 64.8%
#9

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.038240 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 33.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 64.8%
#10

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.054360 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 89.5%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 50%
#11

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.057360 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 100%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 47.2%
#12

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.072480 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 152.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%
#13

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.073920 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 157.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 32%
#14

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.095600 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 12.1%
#15

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.105600 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 268.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 2.9%
#16

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.108720 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 279.1%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Same
#17

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.120960
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 321.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 11.3%
#18

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.120960
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 321.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 11.3%
#19

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.152960 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 433.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 40.7%
#20

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 531.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#21

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 531.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#22

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 531.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#23

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.181200 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 531.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#24

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 75.9%
#25

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 75.9%
#26

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 75.9%
#27

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.191200 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 75.9%
#28

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.342400 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1093.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 214.9%
#29

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.357600 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1146.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 228.9%
#30

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.357600 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1146.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 228.9%
#31

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.362400 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1163.6%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
#32

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.362400 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1163.6%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
#33

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.382400 (rounded ~ $0.38)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 1233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 251.7%
#34

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.684800 (rounded ~ $0.68)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 2287.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 529.9%
#35

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.724800 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 2427.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%
#36

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.724800 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs GPT-5.4 Mini: ↑ 2427.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Choosing the Right Engine for Healthcare Script Production

For healthcare administrators producing high volumes of video scripts—such as patient education, clinical training, or regulatory updates—selecting the correct AI model involves balancing nuanced communication against production efficiency. When managing a pipeline of 128,000 tokens per month, the choice between GPT-5.4 Mini and Claude Sonnet 4.6 often comes down to the specific nature of your content.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has gained a reputation in creative and professional domains for its ability to maintain a sophisticated, empathetic, and structured tone. In healthcare environments where the script must convey complex clinical information while remaining accessible and patient-friendly, Claude often requires fewer iterative prompts to hit the right balance of warmth and accuracy. Its reasoning capabilities make it highly effective for longer, more complex scripts that require deep logical flow and adherence to strict messaging guidelines.

GPT-5.4 Mini, by contrast, is a powerhouse for operational scalability. If your video production strategy relies on templates, rapid-fire generation of procedural training scripts, or high-volume administrative messaging, this model provides the necessary speed and consistency. It is particularly well-suited for pipelines where you need to integrate scripts into larger, automated workflows that prioritize throughput. While it may require slightly more detailed prompting to achieve the same stylistic polish as Claude for highly sensitive patient communication, its performance across general administrative tasks is reliable. For administrators, the decision hinges on whether your priority is the ‘human’ touch required for patient engagement or the raw scalability required for internal operational content.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

GPT-5.4 mini currently costs $0.75 / $4.50 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →