GPT-6 Sol OpenAI 1050000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.200000
- Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.115000 (rounded ~ $0.12)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000572
- Tokens per dollar: 1,747,826 tokens
- Context Window: 1050000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 131 tokens per second and 340ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 26 minutes, 5.22 seconds
- Latency: 340 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 131 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 128 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-6 Sol. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-6 Sol| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005750 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005800 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 93.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92.3% cheaper |
| #6 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.014125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 87.7% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.021563 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 81.3% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.021563 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 81.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 81.1% cheaper |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.029000 | ↓ 74.8% cheaper |
| #13 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.038445 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 66.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 52.2% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 49.6% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.073750 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.086250 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 25% cheaper |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.110000 | ↓ 4.3% cheaper |
| #21 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.112000 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 2.6% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.112000 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 2.6% cheaper |
| #23 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.115000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | Same price |
| #24 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.115000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | Same price |
| #25 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 0.9% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 25% more |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 25% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 25% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 25% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 26.1% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 26.1% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 26.1% more |
| #33 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 133.7% more |
| #34 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 133.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 150% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 150% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.290000 | ↑ 152.2% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.575000 (rounded ~ $0.58) | ↑ 400% more |
| #39 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.575000 (rounded ~ $0.58) | ↑ 400% more |
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
As modern software engineering teams manage increasingly complex, sprawling codebases, the ability to perform deep, contextual analysis on every pull request is critical. GPT-6 Sol offers a balanced approach for these engineering-heavy workloads, providing sophisticated reasoning that is particularly adept at handling multi-step logic and identifying subtle bugs that simpler models might overlook. For teams that integrate AI into their CI/CD pipelines, this model’s ability to maintain high accuracy during complex refactoring or architectural reviews makes it a standout choice.
Unlike faster, lighter models, GPT-6 Sol is designed for tasks where precision is paramount, such as ensuring that new features comply with existing security protocols and internal coding standards. It excels at reasoning through dependencies across different modules, which is essential for large-scale enterprise applications. While it may require more computational overhead than lightweight alternatives, the trade-off is often fewer false positives in automated code reviews. For customer support leads and engineering managers looking to automate the escalation of code-related issues, this model provides the necessary depth to draft comprehensive, actionable feedback for developers. Integrating it into your review process allows for more nuanced automated triaging, ultimately reducing the burden on senior engineers and accelerating the deployment lifecycle for high-quality software.