Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001500
Output: $0.001500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 120,000 input tokens and 2,500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Output Cost: $0.001500
- Total Cost: $0.019500
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000159
- Tokens per dollar: 6,282,051 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 150ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 5 minutes, 27.87 seconds
- Latency: 150 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Llama 4 Maverick (400B). Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Llama 4 Maverick (400B)| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.010590 Best Value | ↓ 45.7% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.023430 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 20.2% more |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.028350 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 45.4% more |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.035770 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 83.4% more |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.052950 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 171.5% more |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.056700 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 190.8% more |
| #7 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.067548 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 246.4% more |
| #8 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.085050 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 336.2% more |
| #9 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.105076 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 438.9% more |
| #10 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.108400 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 455.9% more |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.110900 | ↑ 468.7% more |
| #12 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.119240 | ↑ 511.5% more |
| #13 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.129250 | ↑ 562.8% more |
| #14 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.148000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 659% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.170100 | ↑ 772.3% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 962.6% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 962.6% more |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.211800 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 986.2% more |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.226800 (rounded ~ $0.23) | ↑ 1063.1% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↑ 1353.8% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↑ 1353.8% more |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.332700 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 1606.2% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) | ↑ 2743.6% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) | ↑ 2743.6% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) | ↑ 2743.6% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57) | ↑ 2807.7% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57) | ↑ 2807.7% more |
| #28 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$1.084000 (rounded ~ $1.08) | ↑ 5459% more |
| #29 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.168000 (rounded ~ $2.17) | ↑ 11017.9% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49) | ↑ 12650.8% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49) | ↑ 12650.8% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Llama 4 Maverick (400B): A Cost-Effective Powerhouse for EdTech AI Orchestration
For EdTech product managers focused on delivering scalable AI tutoring solutions without breaking the bank, Meta AI’s Llama 4 Maverick (400B) presents a highly attractive option. This model combines strong reasoning and multimodal capabilities with an exceptionally competitive price point, making it ideal for multi-agent orchestration where cost per session is a critical factor.
Model Strengths for Multi-Agent Orchestration:
- Exceptional Cost-Performance: Llama 4 Maverick offers one of the best performance-to-cost ratios available, with pricing as low as $0.15 per 1 million input tokens and $0.60 per 1 million output tokens [19]. This makes it highly scalable for large numbers of concurrent agents or frequent task executions.
- Large Context Window: With a 1,000,000 token context window, it can effectively manage complex educational scenarios, student histories, and detailed lesson plans.
- Multimodal Capabilities: While the primary use case is text-based orchestration, its support for vision allows for future expansion into interactive learning materials or student work analysis.
- Reasoning and Tool Use: The model is capable of complex reasoning and tool integration, essential for agents to perform tasks like retrieving educational content, analyzing student responses, or guiding learning paths.
Pricing Analysis:
The pricing of Llama 4 Maverick is remarkably low, positioning it as a leading choice for cost-sensitive applications [19]. While some sources may show slightly varied pricing, the $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens is a widely cited benchmark for its value proposition.
Cost Example for Multi-Agent Orchestration (120K Input, 2.5K Output Tokens):
Consider an orchestrator managing student progress tracking and adaptive content assignment, using 120,000 input tokens and generating 2,500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: (120,000 / 1,000,000) * $0.15 = $0.018
- Output Cost: (2,500 / 1,000,000) * $0.60 = $0.0015
- Total per task: $0.0195
For 10,000 such tasks per month, this would only cost approximately $195. This extremely low cost allows for extensive use of AI agents, even in high-volume tutoring scenarios, without prohibitive expenses.
Best Use Cases:
Highly recommended for multi-agent systems where cost-per-session is a primary constraint, such as large-scale adaptive learning platforms, automated assessment graders, or personalized learning path generators that require processing significant context.