Marketing Copy A/B Testing: GPT-5.4 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.6 for 500K Tokens

Claude Haiku 4.6 is no longer available

This model has been withdrawn by its provider and can no longer be called. The figures below are kept as a historical record and do not reflect a currently purchasable rate.

See current Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

GPT-5.4 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.6
Complete Comparison: 500,000 input tokens × 5,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 20% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 20% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.6
Anthropic
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (20% cached)
Input Tokens 500,000 500,000
Output Tokens 5,000 5,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Worst $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Output Cost $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst $0.001563Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.082500 (rounded ~ $0.08) Most Expensive $0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value
Processing Time 18 minutes, 0.88 seconds Slowest 10 minutes, 35.89 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 500Slowest 850Fastest
Time to First Token 180ms Worst 75ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000163Worst $0.000054Best
Tokens per Dollar 6,121,212Worst Value 18,574,713Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Worst $0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
20
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

ℹ️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 400,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.

Select AI Model

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAIMax Context: 400,000 tokens
$0.75 / $4.5 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
20%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.075000 Input Cost
$0.005625 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
505,000Total Tokens
$0.000163Cost per 1K
6,121,212Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

18m 0s Processing Time
500 Tokens/Second
180ms Time to First Token
467 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

$0.082500 (rounded ~ $0.08)
Total Cost
⚠️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 400,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.099375 Input: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.082500 (rounded ~ $0.08) Input: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.016875 (rounded ~ $0.02) 17.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
  • Output Cost: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.082500 (rounded ~ $0.08)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000163
  • Tokens per dollar: 6,121,212 tokens
  • Context Window: 400000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 18 minutes, 0.88 seconds
  • Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for social media managers needing to generate high volumes of creative copy variations for A/B testing while maintaining tight control over structural formats.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Total Cost
⚠️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 200,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.032813 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001563
Optimized Cost $0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001563
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) 17.1% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Output Cost: $0.001563
  • Total Cost: $0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000054
  • Tokens per dollar: 18,574,713 tokens
  • Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 10 minutes, 35.89 seconds
  • Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for social media managers needing to generate high volumes of creative copy variations for A/B testing while maintaining tight control over structural formats.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to GPT-5.4 mini
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 500,000
Output Tokens: 5,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 20%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs GPT-5.4 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.6
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value ↓ 66.7% cheaper ↑ 1.1% more
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.033875 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 58.9% cheaper ↑ 24.6% more
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.033875 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 58.9% cheaper ↑ 24.6% more
#4 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.081563 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↓ 1.1% cheaper ↑ 200% more
#5 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.110000 ↑ 33.3% more ↑ 304.6% more
#6 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.163125 (rounded ~ $0.16) ↑ 97.7% more ↑ 500% more
#7 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.165000 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 100% more ↑ 506.9% more
#8 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.217500 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↑ 163.6% more ↑ 700% more
#9 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.220000 ↑ 166.7% more ↑ 709.2% more
#10 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.275000 (rounded ~ $0.28) ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 911.5% more
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.326250 (rounded ~ $0.33) ↑ 295.5% more ↑ 1100% more
#12 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54) ↑ 559.1% more ↑ 1900% more
#13 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54) ↑ 559.1% more ↑ 1900% more
#14 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54) ↑ 559.1% more ↑ 1900% more
#15 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54) ↑ 559.1% more ↑ 1900% more
#16 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.550000 ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 1923% more
#17 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.550000 ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 1923% more
#18 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.840000 ↑ 918.2% more ↑ 2989.7% more
#19 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.840000 ↑ 918.2% more ↑ 2989.7% more
#20 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.865000 (rounded ~ $0.87) ↑ 948.5% more ↑ 3081.6% more
#21 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$1.068750 (rounded ~ $1.07) ↑ 1195.5% more ↑ 3831% more
#22 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$1.068750 (rounded ~ $1.07) ↑ 1195.5% more ↑ 3831% more
#23 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$1.081250 (rounded ~ $1.08) ↑ 1210.6% more ↑ 3877% more
#24 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$1.081250 (rounded ~ $1.08) ↑ 1210.6% more ↑ 3877% more
#25 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$1.087500 (rounded ~ $1.09) ↑ 1218.2% more ↑ 3900% more
#26 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$1.087500 (rounded ~ $1.09) ↑ 1218.2% more ↑ 3900% more
#27 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$2.162500 (rounded ~ $2.16) ↑ 2521.2% more ↑ 7854% more
#28 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$4.350000 ↑ 5172.7% more ↑ 15900% more
#29 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$4.350000 ↑ 5172.7% more ↑ 15900% more
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 66.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1.1%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.033875 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 58.9%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 24.6%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.033875 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 58.9%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 24.6%
#4

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.081563 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 1.1%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%
#5

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.110000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 33.3%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 304.6%
#6

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.163125 (rounded ~ $0.16)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 97.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 500%
#7

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.165000 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 100%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 506.9%
#8

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.217500 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 163.6%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%
#9

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.220000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 166.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 709.2%
#10

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.275000 (rounded ~ $0.28)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 911.5%
#11

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.326250 (rounded ~ $0.33)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 295.5%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%
#12

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 559.1%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
#13

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 559.1%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
#14

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 559.1%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
#15

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.543750 (rounded ~ $0.54)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 559.1%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
#16

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.550000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1923%
#17

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.550000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1923%
#18

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.840000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 918.2%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2989.7%
#19

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.840000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 918.2%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2989.7%
#20

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.865000 (rounded ~ $0.87)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 948.5%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3081.6%
#21

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$1.068750 (rounded ~ $1.07)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1195.5%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3831%
#22

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$1.068750 (rounded ~ $1.07)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1195.5%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3831%
#23

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$1.081250 (rounded ~ $1.08)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1210.6%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3877%
#24

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$1.081250 (rounded ~ $1.08)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1210.6%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3877%
#25

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$1.087500 (rounded ~ $1.09)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1218.2%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
#26

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$1.087500 (rounded ~ $1.09)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1218.2%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
#27

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$2.162500 (rounded ~ $2.16)
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 2521.2%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7854%
#28

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$4.350000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 5172.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 15900%
#29

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$4.350000
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 5172.7%
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 15900%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For marketing teams managing multiple brand accounts, A/B testing 20 variations per campaign is standard practice to optimize conversion rates [1.1.3]. Scaling this volume requires models that balance creative nuance with instruction-following reliability. When processing 500,000 tokens for batch experimentation, the choice often comes down to model temperament and structured output capabilities.

GPT-5.4 mini has emerged as a strong contender for structured tasks. It excels at following precise formatting constraints—essential when you need to generate 20 consistent variations for a campaign without breaking your deployment schema. It is often described as more “innovative” in its suggestion generation, making it effective for brainstorming divergent angles during the initial hypothesis phase.

Claude Haiku 4.6, conversely, is favored for its adherence to brand tone and ability to maintain narrative consistency across high-volume outputs. If your A/B tests rely on subtle adjustments to brand voice rather than just structural changes, Haiku’s ability to avoid repetitive or muted emotional responses provides a distinct advantage.

For most social media managers, the decision hinges on the goal of the test. If you prioritize strict adherence to your existing copy framework and JSON-like structural requirements, GPT-5.4 mini is the logical choice. If your priority is creative variety while maintaining a consistent emotional resonance across diverse audiences, Claude Haiku 4.6 offers a more polished result. Both models are optimized for high-speed, cost-efficient processing, making them suitable for the iterative nature of modern A/B testing pipelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.