Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000750
Output: $0.000750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.000750
- Total Cost: $0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000075
- Tokens per dollar: 13,377,049 tokens
- Context Window: 256000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 160ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 28.26 seconds
- Latency: 160 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 490 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Mistral Large 3. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Mistral Large 3| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.003250 Best Value | ↓ 57.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003250 | ↓ 57.4% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003350 | ↓ 56.1% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.004188 | ↓ 45.1% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 29.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 29.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 59.8% more |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 59.8% more |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 64.8% more |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 113.1% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 119.7% more |
| #12 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.020790 | ↑ 172.7% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 307.4% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 307.4% more |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 309.8% more |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 326.2% more |
| #17 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 326.2% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 339.3% more |
| #19 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 482% more |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 539.3% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 673.8% more |
| #22 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 673.8% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 719.7% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 752.5% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 752.5% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 752.5% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 778.7% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 965.6% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 965.6% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 965.6% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 965.6% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 998.4% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 998.4% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 998.4% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1908.2% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1908.2% more |
| #37 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 2031.1% more |
| #38 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 2031.1% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 2096.7% more |
| #40 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 4162.3% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 4788.5% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 4788.5% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Mistral Large 3 has established itself as a cornerstone for legal teams requiring robust, open-weights model performance for due diligence. When processing 100K-token document sets, its architecture offers a distinct advantage for teams that need to balance high-level reasoning with the flexibility of self-hosting or specific deployment environments. Unlike smaller, more constrained models, this flagship model maintains high semantic fidelity even when navigating dense, multi-page legal agreements where precision is paramount.
For legal professionals, the primary strength of this model lies in its ability to parse complex regulatory language while minimizing the hallucination risks often seen in smaller parameter models. It excels at identifying conflicting clauses across large document volumes, which is essential during the initial stages of a merger or acquisition discovery process. While it may require slightly more careful prompt engineering compared to some closed-source alternatives, the depth of its reasoning capabilities makes it a reliable choice for sensitive audit trails. Teams that prioritize data sovereignty and long-term control over their model environment often find this to be the superior choice. Its ability to maintain coherence across lengthy, intricate contracts allows practitioners to focus on high-level legal strategy rather than cleaning up model outputs. Integration with existing legal tech stacks is straightforward, making it an efficient addition to established document review workflows where compliance and accuracy are non-negotiable requirements.