Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000250
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Resolution: 1080p
Tokens: 258
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 128,000 input tokens and 50,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.016032 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Output Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Unit Cost: $0.000250
- Total Cost: $0.035032 (rounded ~ $0.04)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000197
- Tokens per dollar: 5,088,397 tokens
- Context Window: 256000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 160ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 14.52 seconds
- Latency: 160 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 476 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Mistral Large 3. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Llama 3.3 70B Meta AI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.060000
Output: $0.060000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 128,000 input tokens and 50,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.076800 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Output Cost: $0.060000
- Total Cost: $0.136800 (rounded ~ $0.14)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000769
- Tokens per dollar: 1,301,170 tokens
- Context Window: 131000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 13.98 seconds
- Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 476 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Llama 3.3 70B. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Mistral Large 3| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Mistral Large 3 | vs Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.026766 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value | ↓ 23.6% cheaper | ↓ 80.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.040869 | ↑ 16.7% more | ↓ 70.1% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
|
$0.049442 | ↑ 41.1% more | ↓ 63.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.071331 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 103.6% more | ↓ 47.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.080298 | ↑ 129.2% more | ↓ 41.3% cheaper |
| #6 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.090271 | ↑ 157.7% more | ↓ 34% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.094565 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 169.9% more | ↓ 30.9% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.107065 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 205.6% more | ↓ 21.7% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.160597 | ↑ 358.4% more | ↑ 17.4% more |
| #10 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.231113 (rounded ~ $0.23) | ↑ 559.7% more | ↑ 68.9% more |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.283694 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↑ 709.8% more | ↑ 107.4% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.330161 | ↑ 842.4% more | ↑ 141.3% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.428258 (rounded ~ $0.43) | ↑ 1122.5% more | ↑ 213.1% more |
| #14 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.472823 (rounded ~ $0.47) | ↑ 1249.7% more | ↑ 245.6% more |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.472823 (rounded ~ $0.47) | ↑ 1249.7% more | ↑ 245.6% more |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.472823 (rounded ~ $0.47) | ↑ 1249.7% more | ↑ 245.6% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.535323 (rounded ~ $0.54) | ↑ 1428.1% more | ↑ 291.3% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.535323 (rounded ~ $0.54) | ↑ 1428.1% more | ↑ 291.3% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.535323 (rounded ~ $0.54) | ↑ 1428.1% more | ↑ 291.3% more |
| #20 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.820645 | ↑ 2242.5% more | ↑ 499.9% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.070645 | ↑ 2956.2% more | ↑ 682.6% more |
| #22 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.641290 (rounded ~ $1.64) | ↑ 4585.1% more | ↑ 1099.8% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$3.211935 (rounded ~ $3.21) | ↑ 9068.5% more | ↑ 2247.9% more |
| #24 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$3.211935 (rounded ~ $3.21) | ↑ 9068.5% more | ↑ 2247.9% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI
Grok 4.3 xAI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
The Balanced Choice
Mistral Large 3 remains a top-tier MoE model for multilingual tasks and enterprise tools. Llama 3.3 70B is the stable open-weights workhorse for fine-tuning. Mistral offers a 256k window and native vision, while Llama 3.3 70B is the preferred choice for companies building private, fine-tuned models for specific niche domains.