Nano Banana Pro Google
$107.200000
Total Cost
Vision/Images
✓ Available
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
Tool Usage
✓ Available
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✗ Not Available
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Base Cost (No Optimizations)
$107.200000
Input: $0.000000
Output: $0.000000
Output: $0.000000
Optimized Cost
$107.200000
Input: $0.000000
Output: $0.000000
Unit: $107.200000
Fees: $0.000000
Output: $0.000000
Unit: $107.200000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 0 input tokens and 0 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.000000
- Output Cost: $0.000000
- Unit Cost: $107.200000
- Total Cost: $107.200000
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000000
- Tokens per dollar: 0 tokens
- Context Window: 4096 tokens
- Thinking Source: (0 tokens)
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 1,200 tokens per second and 50ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 0.18 seconds
- Latency: 50 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 1,200 tokens/second
Best Use Cases
High-fidelity marketing asset creationinfographic generationand brand-consistent visual content with text rendering.
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Nano Banana Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Nano Banana Pro
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens:
0
Output Tokens:
0
Images:
800 (Medium Resolution)
Tools:
Enabled
| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.082560 (rounded ~ $0.08) Best Value | ↓ 99.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.082560 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 99.9% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.103200 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 99.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.123840 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↓ 99.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.123840 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↓ 99.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
|
$0.193200 (rounded ~ $0.19) | ↓ 99.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.206400 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↓ 99.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.207400 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↓ 99.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.309600 | ↓ 99.7% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.309600 | ↓ 99.7% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.309600 | ↓ 99.7% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.412800 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↓ 99.6% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.412800 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↓ 99.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta AI
|
$0.516000 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↓ 99.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.564128 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↓ 99.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral AI
|
$0.619200 | ↓ 99.4% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.722400 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↓ 99.3% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.722400 (rounded ~ $0.72) | ↓ 99.3% cheaper |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↓ 99.2% cheaper |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↓ 99.2% cheaper |
| #21 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↓ 99.2% cheaper |
| #22 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↓ 99.2% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$1.032000 (rounded ~ $1.03) | ↓ 99% cheaper |
| #24 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$1.032000 (rounded ~ $1.03) | ↓ 99% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$1.238400 (rounded ~ $1.24) | ↓ 98.8% cheaper |
| #26 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
$1.238400 (rounded ~ $1.24) | ↓ 98.8% cheaper |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #29 |
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #30 |
Grok 4.7
xAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #31 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #32 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #33 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #34 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #35 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65) | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| #36 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #37 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #38 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #39 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #40 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #41 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06) | ↓ 98.1% cheaper |
| #43 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13) | ↓ 96.1% cheaper |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13) | ↓ 96.1% cheaper |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13) | ↓ 96.1% cheaper |
| #46 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13) | ↓ 96.1% cheaper |
| #47 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13) | ↓ 96.1% cheaper |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$8.256000 (rounded ~ $8.26) | ↓ 92.3% cheaper |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$8.668800 (rounded ~ $8.67) | ↓ 91.9% cheaper |
| #50 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$12.384000 (rounded ~ $12.38) | ↓ 88.4% cheaper |
| #51 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$12.384000 (rounded ~ $12.38) | ↓ 88.4% cheaper |
🏆
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
$0.082560 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.9%
🥈
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
$0.082560 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.9%
🥉
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
$0.103200 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.9%
#4
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
$0.123840 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.9%
#5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
$0.123840 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.9%
#6
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI
$0.193200 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.8%
#7
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
$0.206400 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.8%
#8
Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
$0.207400 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.8%
#9
GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
$0.309600
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.7%
#10
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
$0.309600
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.7%
#11
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
$0.309600
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.7%
#12
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
$0.412800 (rounded ~ $0.41)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.6%
#13
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
$0.412800 (rounded ~ $0.41)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.6%
#14
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 Meta AI
$0.516000 (rounded ~ $0.52)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.5%
#15
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
$0.564128 (rounded ~ $0.56)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.5%
#16
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI
$0.619200
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.4%
#17
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
$0.722400 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.3%
#18
GPT-5.3 Instant
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
$0.722400 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.3%
#19
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.2%
#20
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.2%
#21
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon Google
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.2%
#22
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
$0.825600 (rounded ~ $0.83)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99.2%
#23
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
$1.032000 (rounded ~ $1.03)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99%
#24
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 xAI
$1.032000 (rounded ~ $1.03)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 99%
#25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
$1.238400 (rounded ~ $1.24)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.8%
#26
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
$1.238400 (rounded ~ $1.24)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.8%
#27
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#28
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#29
Muse Wonder 1.0
Muse Wonder 1.0 Meta AI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#30
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 xAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#31
Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 xAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#32
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 xAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#33
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#34
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#35
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
$1.651200 (rounded ~ $1.65)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.5%
#36
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#37
GPT-5.4 Thinking
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#38
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#39
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#40
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#41
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#42
GPT-5.5 Instant
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
$2.064000 (rounded ~ $2.06)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 98.1%
#43
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 96.1%
#44
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 96.1%
#45
Claude Mythos 5.1
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 96.1%
#46
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 96.1%
#47
Claude Mythos 5
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
$4.128000 (rounded ~ $4.13)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 96.1%
#48
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
$8.256000 (rounded ~ $8.26)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 92.3%
#49
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
$8.668800 (rounded ~ $8.67)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 91.9%
#50
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
$12.384000 (rounded ~ $12.38)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 88.4%
#51
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
$12.384000 (rounded ~ $12.38)
vs Nano Banana Pro:
↓ 88.4%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.
For marketing teams managing high-volume, recurring image generation, Nano Banana Pro has emerged as a specialized powerhouse. Unlike general-purpose LLMs that rely on external plugins or third-party APIs for visualization, Nano Banana Pro is purpose-built for high-fidelity marketing assets, including product renders, infographics, and custom brand visuals. Its integration with Google Search grounding allows it to incorporate real-world brand context directly into the generation process, which significantly reduces the need for manual prompt iterative refinement.
Choosing Nano Banana Pro for an 800-image monthly campaign is often driven by its consistency and specialized control features. The model offers superior handling of complex text-within-image requirements—a historical pain point in generative design—and maintains brand consistency through its multi-image composition capabilities. While general models excel at broad creative tasks, Nano Banana Pro’s architecture is optimized for the specific constraints of professional graphic design workflows, such as maintaining strict aspect ratios and studio-quality output. Teams prioritizing visual fidelity and the ability to integrate live web data into their infographics will find this model’s workflow significantly more efficient than standard text-to-image alternatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly.
We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing.
Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How are image tokens calculated?
Images are tokenized based on resolution: Low: 85 tokens, Medium: 170 tokens, High: 255 tokens, Full: 765 tokens per image. Some models (like Llama 4 Maverick) use tile-based encoding with 1,610 tokens/image (standard) or 8,050 tokens/image (high-res).
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.