o3 Pro OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.300000
Output: $0.300000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.250000
- Output Cost: $0.300000
- Total Cost: $0.505000 (rounded ~ $0.51)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.007769 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Tokens per dollar: 128,713 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 350 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 11.47 seconds
- Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 350 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 340 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o3 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o3 Pro| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o3 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002150 Best Value | ↓ 99.6% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 98.4% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.010750 | ↓ 97.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.012450 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.012450 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 95.7% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.024563 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 95.1% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.025250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| #9 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.027775 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 94.5% cheaper |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.029000 | ↓ 94.3% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.032750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 93.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.032750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 93.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.043500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 91.4% cheaper |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.049125 | ↓ 90.3% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 88.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.070438 | ↓ 86.1% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.070438 | ↓ 86.1% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.071000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 85.9% cheaper |
| #19 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.071000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 85.9% cheaper |
| #20 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.081875 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 83.8% cheaper |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.087000 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 82.8% cheaper |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.100625 | ↓ 80.1% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.131000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 74.1% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 71.3% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 71.3% cheaper |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 71.3% cheaper |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 71.3% cheaper |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.163750 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.163750 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #30 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.163750 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #31 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.163750 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #32 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.252500 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #33 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.288125 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↓ 42.9% cheaper |
| #34 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.288125 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↓ 42.9% cheaper |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.290000 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.290000 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.327500 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↓ 35.1% cheaper |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.580000 | ↑ 14.9% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.845250 (rounded ~ $0.85) | ↑ 67.4% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.845250 (rounded ~ $0.85) | ↑ 67.4% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Deep Reasoning for Academic Synthesis
For researchers managing the drafting phase of literature reviews, the primary challenge is not just text generation, but maintaining logical coherence across long documents. o3-pro represents a shift toward reasoning-first architectures. Unlike standard autoregressive models that prioritize speed, o3-pro allocates significant compute to internal chain-of-thought processing before outputting a single token. This makes it an ideal partner for synthesizing contradictory academic sources where precision in argumentation is paramount.
When drafting a 65K-token research document, you are likely dealing with high-density information—summarizing methodologies, comparing theoretical frameworks, and identifying gaps in previous studies. o3-pro excels here by performing self-verification steps, reducing the common headache of hallucinated citations or misattributed claims found in general-purpose models. While the latency is higher than non-reasoning models due to the deliberate thinking process, the trade-off is a draft that requires significantly less human correction during the editing phase.
This model is best suited for the final synthesis of complex papers where the cost of a factual error—or a hallucinated study—is high. If your research workflow involves high-stakes hypothesis generation or technical reviews, the reasoning depth provided by o3-pro can be the difference between a draft that needs rewriting and one that is ready for peer review.