o3 Deep Research OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.150000
Output: $0.150000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
- Output Cost: $0.150000
- Total Cost: $0.218750 (rounded ~ $0.22)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.003365
- Tokens per dollar: 297,143 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 80 tokens per second and 450ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 14 minutes, 29.56 seconds
- Latency: 450 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 80 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 75 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o3 Deep Research. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Output: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
- Output Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Total Cost: $0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001971
- Tokens per dollar: 507,317 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4 minutes, 27.68 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o3 Deep Research| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o3 Deep Research | vs Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 97.7% cheaper | ↓ 96% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.7% cheaper | ↓ 96% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.3% cheaper | ↓ 95.4% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.007344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 96.6% cheaper | ↓ 94.3% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.009063 | ↓ 95.9% cheaper | ↓ 92.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.8% cheaper | ↓ 91.1% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.8% cheaper | ↓ 91.1% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.019219 | ↓ 91.2% cheaper | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.019219 | ↓ 91.2% cheaper | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.022031 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 89.9% cheaper | ↓ 82.8% cheaper |
| #11 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.025025 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 88.6% cheaper | ↓ 80.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.025625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 88.3% cheaper | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.029375 | ↓ 86.6% cheaper | ↓ 77.1% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.050625 | ↓ 76.9% cheaper | ↓ 60.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 76.6% cheaper | ↓ 60% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 76.6% cheaper | ↓ 60% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 73.7% cheaper | ↓ 55.1% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 73.7% cheaper | ↓ 55.1% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 73.1% cheaper | ↓ 54.1% cheaper |
| #20 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 70.5% cheaper | ↓ 49.6% cheaper |
| #21 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 70.5% cheaper | ↓ 49.6% cheaper |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.076875 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 64.9% cheaper | ↓ 40% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.092188 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 57.9% cheaper | ↓ 28% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 53.7% cheaper | ↓ 21% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 53.1% cheaper | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 53.1% cheaper | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #27 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 53.1% cheaper | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↓ 46.3% cheaper | ↓ 8.3% cheaper |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 41.4% cheaper | Same price |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 41.4% cheaper | Same price |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 41.4% cheaper | Same price |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 41.4% cheaper | Same price |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 32.9% cheaper | ↑ 14.6% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 32.9% cheaper | ↑ 14.6% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 32.9% cheaper | ↑ 14.6% more |
| #36 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 15% more | ↑ 96.3% more |
| #37 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 15% more | ↑ 96.3% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 17.1% more | ↑ 100% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 17.1% more | ↑ 100% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.293750 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 34.3% more | ↑ 129.3% more |
| #41 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.512500 (rounded ~ $0.51) | ↑ 134.3% more | ↑ 300% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 254% more | ↑ 504.4% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 254% more | ↑ 504.4% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
For complex academic writing, the balance between analytical depth and prose quality is essential. o3 Deep Research is particularly powerful when your literature review requires iterative, multi-step verification to ensure citations are grounded and accurate, minimizing the hallucination risks often found in standard generation. It excels at breaking down intricate research topics into structured, logical arguments. In contrast, Claude Opus 4.7 is often the preferred choice for the actual drafting phase. Its strength lies in its ability to handle nuanced stylistic instructions, maintaining a coherent tone and structure across long documents. While o3 handles the heavy lifting of fact-finding, Claude excels at the ‘human’ side of writing—smoothing out complex explanations and ensuring the flow of your arguments is engaging and readable. Choosing between them often comes down to your primary pain point: if you struggle with gathering and verifying complex information, o3 is the strategic partner. If your research is already structured but you need help synthesizing it into a high-quality, professional-grade narrative, Claude Opus 4.7 provides a superior level of control and linguistic precision. Both models are capable of processing large inputs, but their workflows differ significantly in how they handle tool-use and reasoning depth. Use o3 to ensure your foundation is rock-solid, then pivot to Claude to refine the narrative arc and final delivery.