Claude Opus 5 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.250000
- Output Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000823
- Tokens per dollar: 1,214,815 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 12 minutes, 11.35 seconds
- Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 280 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 5| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 94.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 90.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 84.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #8 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 79.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.050625 | ↓ 70% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 68.9% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 60% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.070000 | ↓ 58.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 48.1% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 40% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | Same price |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | Same price |
| #17 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | Same price |
| #18 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #23 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.240000 | ↑ 42.2% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.240000 | ↑ 42.2% more |
| #25 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 57% more |
| #26 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↑ 88.9% more |
| #27 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↑ 88.9% more |
| #28 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 100% more |
| #29 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 100% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↑ 292.6% more |
| #31 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$1.350000 | ↑ 700% more |
| #32 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$1.350000 | ↑ 700% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
For recruiters tasked with producing high-quality video content—whether it’s employer branding spots, candidate interview prep, or internal training modules—Claude Opus 5 offers a robust solution for long-form script development. Producing four high-quality, long-form scripts per week requires a model that can handle complex narrative structures, maintain consistent brand voice, and reason through the specific requirements of a hiring brand strategy.
Claude Opus 5 excels in these areas due to its refined reasoning capabilities, which allow it to take a raw job description or candidate profile and weave it into a compelling, structured script. Unlike smaller, faster models that might lose the thread over long inputs, Opus 5 manages context effectively, ensuring that the tone remains professional and aligned with corporate guidelines. For a recruiter, this means less time spent editing AI hallucinations and more time focusing on video production and candidate engagement.
The model’s ability to plan and iterate makes it particularly suitable for draft-heavy workloads where nuance matters. If your recruitment team produces assets that need to be both informative and persuasive, the higher level of reasoning provided by this model ensures the resulting output is ready for a production setting with minimal manual intervention. Choosing this model is an investment in content quality, reducing the friction often found when scaling video production for HR teams that need to maintain a polished, consistent external image without the overhead of massive creative departments.