Claude Sonnet 5.5 Pricing for Clinical Documentation: 15K-Token RAG

Complete Analysis: 16,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 5.5
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings)
$0.025750 (rounded ~ $0.03) Total Cost
16,000 Total Tokens
54.58 seconds Processing Time
294 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.025750 Total Cost
$0.015000 Input Cost
$0.010000 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
16,000Total Tokens
$0.001609Cost per 1K
621,359Tokens per $

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

54.58s Processing Time
300 Tokens/Second
300ms Time to First Token
294 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Session length for billing

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.025750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.040000 Input: $0.030000
Output: $0.010000
Optimized Cost $0.025750 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.030000
Output: $0.010000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) 35.6% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 15,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.030000
  • Output Cost: $0.010000
  • Total Cost: $0.025750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001609
  • Tokens per dollar: 621,359 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 54.58 seconds
  • Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 294 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for structured clinical documentation and RAG systems requiring high instruction adherence and source attribution.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5.5
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 15,000
Output Tokens: 1,000
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
🏆 Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
 $0.001325 Best Value ↓ 94.9% cheaper
🥈 GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.001325 ↓ 94.9% cheaper
🥉 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.002850 ↓ 88.9% cheaper
#4 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
 $0.003150 ↓ 87.8% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.003563 ↓ 86.2% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.004975 ↓ 80.7% cheaper
#7 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.004975 ↓ 80.7% cheaper
#8 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 78.2% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.007125 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 72.3% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.009938 ↓ 61.4% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.009938 ↓ 61.4% cheaper
#12 Grok Build 0.1
xAI
 $0.010250 ↓ 60.2% cheaper
#13 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.010688 ↓ 58.5% cheaper
#14 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 50.2% cheaper
#15 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 50.2% cheaper
#16 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.013250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 48.5% cheaper
#17 Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
 $0.015400 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 40.2% cheaper
#18 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.020313 ↓ 21.1% cheaper
#19 Grok 4.7
xAI
 $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 12.6% cheaper
#20 Grok 4.6
xAI
 $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 12.6% cheaper
#21 Grok 4.5
xAI
 $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 12.6% cheaper
#22 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 2.9% more
#23 Gemini 4 Argon
Google
 $0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 2.9% more
#24 GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 2.9% more
#25 GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 2.9% more
#26 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
 $0.027550 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 7% more
#27 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 10.4% more
#28 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 10.4% more
#29 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 10.7% more
#30 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 10.7% more
#31 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 38.3% more
#32 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 38.3% more
#33 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.039750 ↑ 54.4% more
#34 Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
 $0.041325 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 60.5% more
#35 Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
 $0.051500 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 100% more
#36 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.053000 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 105.8% more
#37 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 157.3% more
#38 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 157.3% more
#39 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 157.3% more
#40 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 157.3% more
#41 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 176.7% more
#42 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 176.7% more
#43 Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
 $0.080000 ↑ 210.7% more
#44 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 392.7% more
#45 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 392.7% more
#46 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 414.6% more
#47 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 414.6% more
#48 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↑ 414.6% more
#49 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 1225.2% more
#50 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 1225.2% more
🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.001325
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 94.9%
🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.001325
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 94.9%
🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.002850
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 88.9%
#4

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.003150
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 87.8%
#5

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003563
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 86.2%
#6

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004975
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 80.7%
#7

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004975
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 80.7%
#8

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 78.2%
#9

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.007125 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 72.3%
#10

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.009938
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61.4%
#11

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.009938
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 61.4%
#12

Grok Build 0.1
xAI

$0.010250
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 60.2%
#13

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.010688
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 58.5%
#14

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 50.2%
#15

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.012813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 50.2%
#16

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.013250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 48.5%
#17

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.015400 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 40.2%
#18

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.020313
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 21.1%
#19

Grok 4.7
xAI

$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 12.6%
#20

Grok 4.6
xAI

$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 12.6%
#21

Grok 4.5
xAI

$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↓ 12.6%
#22

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 2.9%
#23

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 2.9%
#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 2.9%
#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 2.9%
#26

Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI

$0.027550 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 7%
#27

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 10.4%
#28

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 10.4%
#29

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 10.7%
#30

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 10.7%
#31

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 38.3%
#32

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 38.3%
#33

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.039750
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 54.4%
#34

Kimi K3
Moonshot AI

$0.041325 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 60.5%
#35

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.051500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 100%
#36

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.053000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 105.8%
#37

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 157.3%
#38

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 157.3%
#39

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 157.3%
#40

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 157.3%
#41

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 176.7%
#42

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 176.7%
#43

Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI

$0.080000
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 210.7%
#44

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 392.7%
#45

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.126875 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 392.7%
#46

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 414.6%
#47

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 414.6%
#48

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 414.6%
#49

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1225.2%
#50

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.341250 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: ↑ 1225.2%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For healthcare administrators implementing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) within clinical settings, selecting a model that balances reasoning depth with operational efficiency is critical. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has emerged as a high-performing option for document-heavy environments where handling patient histories and clinical notes is the primary workload. The model is well-suited for RAG pipelines that require high adherence to specific medical schemas, as it demonstrates strong instruction-following capabilities when navigating complex, semi-structured data like Electronic Health Record (EHR) extracts.

When deploying this model, consider the balance between context window utilization and the speed of response. For 15K-token input workloads, Sonnet 5.5 provides a stable output, minimizing the hallucination risks often associated with smaller or less-reasoned models. In healthcare, audit trails are essential; the model’s ability to cite sources within a RAG architecture helps maintain the transparency required for clinical documentation reviews. While larger models might offer deeper reasoning for rare diagnoses, Sonnet 5.5 is often the optimal choice for high-volume, standard documentation tasks where latency and consistent formatting are priorities. Administrators should weigh the model’s throughput requirements against the need for rapid patient triage responses, ensuring that the infrastructure supports the desired concurrency levels without compromising data integrity or HIPAA-aligned data processing standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Sonnet 5.5 currently costs $2.00 / $10.00 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →