DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001400
Output: $0.001400
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.028000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Output Cost: $0.001400
- Total Cost: $0.016800 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000082
- Tokens per dollar: 12,202,381 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 5 minutes, 37.64 seconds
- Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 607 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs DeepSeek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.003125 Best Value | ↓ 81.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok 4.1 Fast
xAI
|
$0.006125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 63.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.007375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 56.1% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 47.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI
|
$0.009275 | ↓ 44.8% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 32.3% cheaper |
| #7 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.012125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 27.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 7% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 56.3% more |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 100.9% more |
| #11 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 272% more |
| #12 |
GPT-5.2
OpenAI
|
$0.065625 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 290.6% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.070000 | ↑ 316.7% more |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 502.7% more |
| #15 |
Grok 4
xAI
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 502.7% more |
| #16 |
Grok 4.1
xAI
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 502.7% more |
| #17 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 904.5% more |
| #18 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 904.5% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 941.7% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 941.7% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 941.7% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 941.7% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 1477.4% more |
| #24 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↑ 3843.5% more |
| #25 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↑ 3843.5% more |
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
Grok 4.1 Fast xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Nemotron 3 Super Mistral AI
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.2 OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4 xAI
Grok 4.1 xAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
For academic researchers who have already digitized their legacy archives and now need to process vast amounts of text, DeepSeek V4 Flash presents an economical and highly efficient option. While not an OCR model itself, its strength lies in its ability to handle large volumes of text data rapidly and affordably, making it ideal for tasks such as summarizing extracted content, performing keyword analysis, or feeding into knowledge graphs. Its architecture is optimized for long contexts and reduced computational cost, allowing researchers to analyze substantial datasets derived from archives without incurring prohibitive expenses. When dealing with text derived from thousands of pages, the cost-effectiveness of models like DeepSeek V4 Flash becomes a critical factor in enabling scalable research and analysis of historical documents.