Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.014063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.014063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.009375
- Output Cost: $0.014063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.019219
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000296
- Tokens per dollar: 3,382,114 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 24.74 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 69.4% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.007344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 61.8% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.009063 | ↓ 52.8% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 40.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 40.5% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.019219 | Same price |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.022031 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 14.6% more |
| #10 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.025025 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 30.2% more |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.025625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.029375 | ↑ 52.8% more |
| #13 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.050625 | ↑ 163.4% more |
| #14 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #16 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 199.2% more |
| #17 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 199.2% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 205.7% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 235.8% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 235.8% more |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.076875 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 300% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.092188 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 379.7% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 426.8% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 511.4% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 664.2% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 664.2% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 664.2% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 1208.9% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 1208.9% more |
| #37 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #38 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.293750 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 1428.5% more |
| #40 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.512500 (rounded ~ $0.51) | ↑ 2566.7% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 3929.3% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 3929.3% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Research Drafting Pipelines
For engineering teams building automated research tools, the primary challenge in literature review and paper drafting is maintaining coherence across extended outputs while minimizing latency. Gemini 3.8 Flash is specifically designed for these high-throughput requirements. By leveraging a large context window, this model enables developers to feed complex research guidelines and massive source datasets into a single call, which is essential for consistent drafting of long-form academic content.
When scaling to 50 million tokens per month, managing the trade-off between reasoning depth and response speed is paramount. This model provides the necessary performance to support real-time user experiences, such as voice-activated research assistants where the time-to-first-token is critical. For voice AI engineers, the ability to process 50K-token inputs without significant latency degradation allows for more fluid, responsive interactions that don’t feel like traditional, sluggish batch processing.
The model’s efficiency is particularly beneficial for high-volume pipelines where cost predictability is as important as technical capability. By maintaining a high performance-to-cost ratio, it allows SaaS teams to scale their research features without compromising on the quality of the generated text. Furthermore, the model’s support for tool-use and thinking capabilities ensures that complex, multi-step research requests—like cross-referencing citations or synthesizing disparate data points—are handled accurately. Choosing the right context management strategy, including the effective use of cached context for recurring research templates, will significantly impact the overall stability and performance of your production system.